We Are What We Eat

690 Words3 Pages
We are what we eat. To me this means what any one person eats determines who they are, what they do, how they are, and so on. Because of this, I must disagree with Schlosser’s statement in which he says, “ We are what we eat”. At the same time I agree with his statement as well. We are what we eat as a nation in general. Schlosser talks about how fast food is everywhere. The reason that fast food is everywhere is because there is an extremely high demand for fast food all across the United States. Think about it, what if all of sudden the government chose to not fund fast food restaurants or allow them to be operational? It would most likely than not cause people to be outraged. Some families probably go to these fast food restaurants because its what they can afford. I guess what I’m saying is that we are what we eat can be true just the same as it can be false. Fast Food in the American society is nothing other than a commodity and if food is a commodity, well then I think that Schlosser is saying that this nation tells him and us exactly what kind of nation we are, and what our priorities are. Look at the difference between us and other countries. For example if someone were to look at France and how they do fast food, it says a lot about their country but not a whole lot about the individuals who live there. Now I’m sure there are people who live in France that have health problems and I’m positive that there are people who are obese but not nearly as many as the United States. This shows me who and what France is and what their priorities are as a nation but not as a people. In the United States, every single patty, burger, fry, is made in mass and bulk to keep the public (which is us) happy and the corporations happier. In the 1920s and 30s when fast food was starting to become really popular, as a nation we were the ones who kept it at such
Open Document