Leadership styles Many theorist and papers exist on this subject. Leadership is the behavior of an individual when he or she is directing the activities of a group towards a shared goal. A leader is seen as someone who sets the paths in an effort to influence people to adhere to those paths. Leadership is an action and not just a position. It can be shown via different people in various situations.
There are many different means and styles of leadership, one of which is by autocratic means. Autocratic leadership is based upon an approach whereby the manager retains the maximum amount of power that they can. All decisions are derived from this leader and no consultation takes place. We shall examine the applicability of an autocratic leadership style in contemporary organisations and also look at some alternative styles. Autocratic leadership Is a more traditional and classical approach to management relying upon threats and punishment to influence its employees.
Different Types of Leadership for Project Management The types of leadership or leadership styles are considered as the possible success factors for project managers. It is a skill being ignored in training as it is not easy to measure the leadership style of a person in the situations of training. The behaviour of leadership can be considered as autocratic, democratic, and bureaucratic while being dependent on the situation (Nixon, et al., 2012). The following leadership styles are common in the domain of project management: • Autocratic: The manager of a project is expected to make the decisions while dominating the team members. This approach results in the passive resistance from the members of teams while requiring the consistent pressure as well as direction from the leader for getting things done.
Murray defines ‘autocratic style of leadership’ as being a person who leads because of the authority they hold. They come up with all ideas of how things should be done and implement them with none or very little consultation with the subordinates below them, as they think subordinates have nothing to offer (Murray 2002,p.13). Murray defines ‘democratic style of leadership’ as being a person who leads a group and treats the subordinates as if they have something to add to the group. He seeks input and consultation in decisions especially by those who the decision effects (Murray 2002,p.13). During the case study there was discussion between the senior officer and the junior officer on what avenues of investigation the junior officer could take to investigate the matter and feedback on how the job was done.
Benjamin E. Hermalin (Dec., 1998) showed that, People follow their leader voluntarily rather than pressure and leader has the power to change followers mind of rational agent. He make them follow blindly without justification. Transformational leader influences followers to transcend their self interests for the good of the organization and make them doing their existing task new ways and put extra effort that brings innovation in the organization. Transformational leader is creative and inspire followers to be creative to accomplish organizational goals or vision ( Robbins and Judge,2009). Karl W. Kuhnert and Philip Lewis, (Oct., 1987) states that, Transformational leadership changes followers values, needs and beliefs to improve performance and quality of performance and convert followers into leaders and may convert leader as moral agent.
Below are all the different types’ leadership styles used in the public services and comparing all there advantages and disadvantages. Authoritarian Authoritarian leadership is a very direct leadership style where the team members MUST do what the team leader has said, if the work is not completed efficiently enough there will be consequences. This approach is not generally considered to be the most appropriate way to get the best response from a team in ordinary working life, but in the armed forces where urgency and pressure is needed to succeed, it is a necessary leadership style. Advantages Disadvantages Maintains order and discipline The team will rely just on the team leader to tell them what to do Decisions are made by only experienced leaders that know what they are doing Team members may feel devalued and fearful of punishment Allows inexperienced recruits to know how and when to do something Team members might not like being ordered what to do all the time without them being told why they have to do it Role of the team leader. The team leader I have chosen to identify is a Lieutenant in the Army.
Individual needs cannot always be satisfied in a team unless a balanced approach and an understanding of the impossibility to satisfy everyone is understood. This is exactly what I encountered in my team work for FOL. Sharing leadership, we listened to each other’s views and acted that we would not be able to satisfy everyone’s needs. With different personalities, behaviours,
No matter what type of organization managers, regardless of what he was in management levels, all managers need to have some management skills, such as Technical skills, design skills, personal skills. Q2. Explain, in your own words, the distinction between a leader and a manager. The biggest difference between leaders and managers is in the way they motivate the people who follow or work for them. Managers have subordinates, unless their title is given as a mark of seniority and honorary, while leaders do not.
It show a person who the leaders of the organization. Traditionally, organizations have a well defined and highly enforced organizational hierarchy system. These systems give supervisors and management the decision making power and staff the obligation to follow. Many people question whether the traditional method of leadership, is conducive to successful work performance. This form of leadership does not foster creative thinking.
So, if there is no follower, there is no leader. Haiman defined Leadership as "the process by which an executive or a manager imaginatively directs, guides and influences the work of others in choosing and attaining specified goals by mediation between the individual and organization in such a manner that both will obtain the maximum satisfaction.” SOME IMPORTANT CHARACTERS OF A LEADER * Integrity * Dedication * Magnanimity * Humility * Openness * Creativity * Fairness * Assertiveness * Sense of humor Leadership styles and management methods across the world are diverse