What style of leadership did the leader exhibit? What problem-solving steps were taken to resolve the situation? What steps would have produced better results? • Explain whether the team or group was effective. Support your position by discussing goals, roles, ground rules, norms, and characteristics your team or group displayed.
Ben Lewis Leadership Styles Leadership, according to Ken Blanchard, is a process which requires leading a team of people and working alongside them in order to achieve specific goals. While the description is deceptively simple, the techniques used to attain the desired result can vary wildly depending on a number of factors and scenarios. These can range from the specific demands of the task, to time constraints, and personality types, of both the leader and team members. Recognising behavioural traits is important when evaluating leadership techniques because decisions and judgements are made by team members based on the personality and behaviour of the leader. There are a number of models that have been developed to analyse leadership styles and to help me explore my own, I am going to use Douglas McGregor’s “XY Theory”, Ken Blanchard’s “Situational Leadership” and John Adair’s “Action Centred Leadership.” Douglas McGregor – XY Theory X Y Autocratic Style Democratic style McGregor’s theory describes a continuum whereby “X” is at one end of a sliding scale and “Y” the other.
In today’s society, people are obsessed with the notion of success and how to achieve it. Many people wonder if there really is a secret to success. According to Colin Powell, former Secretary of State, “There are no secrets to success. It is the result of preparation, hard work, learning from failure.” Throughout the book Outliers, Malcolm Gladwell proves Colin Powell’s quote to be true. There are no secrets one can use to become successful.
Leadership Style HCS 475 Ms. Shelly Uhrid April 8th 2013 Brittany Warnock Leadership styles will help with the direction of the group or team. If one does not understand the leadership style then it could jeopardized the direction of the group or team. It takes one’s knowledge to understand and identify one’s natural style of leading. A leader knows the team’s maturity and what they can handle in different situations. Some of the subjects that will be addressed in this paper are viewing the successful leader and his or her leadership style, addressing why he or she is in the leadership role, and comparing both leadership styles.
What would happen to this stakeholder if I tried to help them in this situation? Who are the primary stakeholders in this problem? The Shareholders (Correct) The original notion was that the shareholders were the only stakeholders of any consequence. The purpose of a company was to maximize shareholder value. The stakeholder theory acknowledges the shareholder’s importance but asserts that they aren’t the only ones whose interests should be considered.
Values influence the leader’s character and professional development, instilling a desire to acquire the essential knowledge to lead. Leaders apply this knowledge within a spectrum of established competencies to achieve successful mission accomplishment. The roles and functions of leaders apply to the three interconnected levels of leadership: direct, organizational, and strategic. Within these levels of leadership, cohesive teams can achieve collective excellence when leadership levels interact effectively. According to the presented research, the relation between cultures and leadership styles is confirmed, therefore the managers are recommended to pay attention to cultural differences in the organizations in order to have more effective and efficient leadership, and to recognize cultures existing in their work scope correctly to provide a suitable style of
As important as needs fulfillment is the requirement to achieve a good fit within the e organization to “set the stage” so to speak for the individual to be able to strive for success. A good fit between task and organization leads to competence and motivation. Project managers must know their people well in order to ensure that they are placed in the correct positions to achieve the most that they can. Hersey & Blanchard Situational Model: Leaders should adapt their style to subordinate style or maturity, based on how ready and willing the follower is to perform required tasks based on their competence and motivation. There are four primary leadership styles listed as S1 to S4 that match four subordinate development levels, D1 to D4.The four styles suggest that leaders should put greater or less focus on the task in question and/or the relationship between the leader and the follower, depending on the development level of the follower.
This is very difficult because in order for the team to feel as equally passionate about the common goal, the manager must communicate the goal in a way that makes each employee feel they are doing their part individually to achieve the common goal. The same goal cannot be communicated to the IT staff in the same way that it is communicated to the operations staff. Each subset of teams has a separate objective all leading to a common goal. Knowing when and how to deal with employees who are performing low is also pertinent as a general manager. Ultimately the general manager wants to have a great team.
Leadership is the process of influencing an individual socially in order to accomplish a common task. According to Schein (2010), a leader is someone who guides the employees to achieve the organizational goals or the leader is someone whom people follow. There are various leadership theories that have been introduced in the world such as trait leadership theory, behavioural leadership theory, contingency theory and transactional and transformational leadership theory. In my opinion, each leadership theory has its own advantages and limitation when we apply it to the real world. This essay analyses the three leadership theories and its application in the real world: situational leadership, servant leadership and transformational leadership.
The pragmatic follower often emerges when an organization is in desperate times. A passive follower does not exhibit neither critical thinking nor active participation. Passive followers usually leave the thinking to the boss. The effective follower is a critical thinker as well as very active in the organization. These people are capable of self-management and they work towards solutions and positive Impact.