Han China vs. Imperial Rome C&C Essay Han China and Imperial Rome were two of the greatest empires during the classical periods. They shared similarities but were also different in many ways. These similarities and differences significant ways the two empires are strong. Han China and Imperial Rome had different political systems and ways on how to run their country which made them advanced and powerful. They were similar in which they were both centralized.
The empires of the “Classical World” evolved techniques that helped control the advancing civilizations. Those techniques helped civilizations become unique and share many similarities and differences. The Roman Empire and Han China were two empires that progressed strongly through the “Classical World” and expanded their empire with the use of a strong administrative structure. The non-hereditary administration in both empires were controlled by emperors (known as a “Consul” in Rome) and a representation of the elite population through the Senate in Rome and the government officials in Han China that were chosen through an exam. Techniques of the both empires also grew through their military that defended the empires and conquered neighboring lands.
It was an enormous weight on Rome's resources and power, when they had to stress over big wins. For example, when there was barely any food to support the developing empire. Similarities Rome and Han China shared similar techniques in their methods of military conquest in relation to their imperial administration. Both Rome and Han China established control of their territory though fighting and defending land. Testaments of this can be seen when Rome used legions that consisted of heavy infantry.
Han and Roman Technology DBQ Essay From the pestle and mortar of Han, China to the flowing aqueducts of the Roman Empire, technology was a big part of ancient civilizations. From the 2nd century BCE through the 1st century CE, both the Han and Roman empires were dealing with the advancements in technology. There were many different attitudes between the two empires, but there were also differences in opinion within the empires themselves. In the Han Empire, some believed that technology was an essential part of an empire and requires government intervention, while others saw it an expensive burden. In the Roman Empire, some believed that technology was necessary, but not necessarily enlightened, while others saw it as a way to show how great their civilization really was.
(“The Roman Republic”) The Censor held this power until the end of the Roman Republic. The Senate directed the consuls and censors in the time of military conflicts. The Senate also had a large amount of power over the government in Rome. The senate also had management
The Gupta dynasty arose in northern and central India, as well as parts of modern day Pakistan and Bangladesh after the nomadic Kushan Empire of India declined. The Gupta dynasty maintained a very decentralized government structure that put local administrators in charge of each part of the dynasty. The politics of the dynasties closely relate and influence their economics. The Gupta dynasty and the Han dynasty are two well-known prosperous kingdoms of Asia that share similarities and difference between the relationship of politics and economics. Politics in the Han dynasty were very important to keep the empire together.
Rome and Han China Rome and Han China were separated by thousands of miles which made them develop independently of each other, but they both managed to flourish at the same time. These Empires have impacted the world around them with their differences in technological developments, other differences they had can be seen through individual economic status and government ideas. A specific example could be the idea of choosing emperors in Rome based on republic ideas versus China which had emperors based on the Mandate of Heaven. While these empires had differences, they also had similarities some examples being agriculture as a main source of income, militaristic views, new religion developments, and patriarchal family structures. Having aggressive neighbors although being so far apart was one similarity in Han and Rome because in order to protect themselves from them they needed a strong military and also needed to build protecting walls.
1) In book 6 of Polybius’ “Histories”, Polybius examines the Roman government and its “mixed” constitution. At the head of the Roman Republic are two elected officials, called consuls, who carry out the decisions of the Senate, lead the army, and generally hold the highest executive authority. Polybius describes the consuls as the monarchical element of the Roman government. The consuls' power, however, is tempered by the authority of the Senate, a small group of Roman political elites who form the aristocratic element in the Roman constitution. The Senate controls the treasury and the public building programs, passes judgment in certain cases of the highest importance (particularly treason), and handles foreign diplomatic affairs.
Romulus Augustus was the last Emperor before the collapse of the Western Roman Empire, while in China, Emperor Xian was the ruler at the time of the collapse. The different dates of collapses shows us today that the Romans had a more clear line of success that the Chinese did. The Chinese were destroyed by a warlord, while the Romans were collapsed by enemy invasions. This is an important contrasting historical fact because it shows the Romans economy/political wall was stronger and more well sub-stained than the Chinese’s Han Dynasty. These Empires are similar in that they both had some sort of political corruptions.
Clearly this was quite a vigorous act, Cicero undertook this in full knowledge it could perhaps lead to his death as Caesar’s army, though lacking numbers, was full of war veterans. However one could call this acting against the republic, as Cicero spent more time with Pompey and his legions it was clear that the upkeep of the republic was not the motive of war but defeating Caesar was. He quarrelled with several of the more prominent Pompeian commanders over their eagerness to shed Roman blood. In Cicero’s opinion, the Pompeians had lost all sense of perspective in their lust to destroy