Why Willaim Duke of Normandy Won the Battle Hastings

1092 Words5 Pages
Why William duke of Normandy won the battle of Hastings The battle of Hastings led to a drastic and irreversible change in medieval England. The result of the battle was that William duke of Normandy with the help of his Norman supporters seized control of England’s throne and changed the culture and the way the country was ruled forever. William’s opponent of the battle was Harold Godwinson, the largest land owner in the country and a man who had been king of England for less than a full year. This essay will examine the reasons why and how William won the throne. Other than Harold Godwinson, two other men were claiming the English throne; their names were William, Duke of Normandy and Harald Hardrada, a Viking from the north. On 21st of September 1066 Harold received word that Harald had arrived in York so he quickly gathered his troops and prepared for a surprise attack at Stamford Bridge. Harold’s army was made up of two types of soldiers. The well paid ones were called the Housecarls and they were well trained and the best fighters in the Saxon army who were there to protect their King. The Housecarls were very loyal because they were paid. The people who were not paid were called the Fyrd. They were not well paid and only very basically trained (every man at the time would know how to use a sword, dagger or axe) and most of them were peasant farmers who had been called up on short notice to fight. Housecarls and the Fyrd were both infantry and Harold barely had any archers if none at all and the Saxons had no cavalry although they probably travelled to Hastings on horses. Harold won the battle at Stamford Bridge, which took place on 25 September 1066, though it was at a cost. By the end of the battle lots of his faithful Housecarls were either dead or injured and all of his men were exhausted. To add to this Harold
Open Document