In this essay I am going to explain why changes in the education system have and have not helped pupils. There are many reasons for and against this claim and I will outline them throughout this essay. A reason that changes in the education system have helped pupils is the national curriculum which was introduced in 1988 (1988 education act). The national curriculum standardised learning as everyone is taught the same thing as well as helping gender equality as males and females have access to all the same subjects. It also can make it easier than in the past for a student who switches schools, because now schools broadly have to follow a similar curriculum.
This is building on to what he said earlier about doing your job and your job only, if you vote on stuff that deal with you will see stuff to start to get better. So, that statement is very logical. His usage of pathos happens later in the essay when states that people in higher positions should help out their students to get better opportunities and scholarships. An example of ethos is when he told his reader about the declaration on the “Civic Responsibility of higher Education.” (p. 175). This declaration said that colleges would help out students to get better resources.
Gerald Graff points out the pressure that society and school put on students to be academically intelligent. Students must have the perfect grades and attend the highest ranking school. Students also have to go to extreme measures to just get through one class because they know that failing is not a option. As Graff says, “To say that students need to see their interests “through academic eyes” is to say that street smarts are not enough” (p.303). I agree with what Graff says and also agree when he says, “The challenge, as a college professor Ned Laff has put it, “is not simply to exploit students’ nonacademic interests, but to get them to see those interests through academic eyes” (p.302).
.” so, even before you look at the expectations, you see that the standards are uniform. This implies that individual differences either don’t exist or are not important enough to be addressed. This kind of wording disregards the fact that not all kids learn the same. Furthermore, considerable research has demonstrated that students who are actively involved in designing their own learning are more successful, so it would make sense to allow more academic freedom in the classroom, and therefore less specific standards. (Kohn,
Fenway High School Essay In my opinion what makes a good school are the students, teachers, and principal. The reason I say those three things is because reason one they all represent the school and they have to work hard to make a school good. I said students because to make a school good the students who attend the school have to have good behavior with good grades, because a school that has good grades get more and more students to apply for it. I said teachers because they are the main ones who give us students our knowledge and education. And with good teachers come good students with good grades.
We have to realize that we will get no where in life complaining that the teachers don't care about us or that we don't get it. The problem with Gato’s essay is that he does not stress the idea of confidence as a solution to boredom. You have to be confident in your learning ability and help yourself out. Thats why i agree with some of the parts of Gatto’s essay, other parts I disagree with and thats why I believe my essay should be read by students so that maybe they can relate to the things i went through or that I am talking
The definition of multiculturalism in the Webster’s Dictionary is: “of or relating to a social or educational theory that encourages interest in many cultures within a society rather than in only a mainstream culture” (Webster’s 2012). Reasons Multiculturalism should be integrated into America’s schools have been met with opposition. With the changing ethnic makeup of our society, Multicultural education is an idea that seeks to develop the same opportunities for all students; it is not geared only for the benefit of those from different racial, ethnic, and social-class groups, but it is also designed to help the middle to upper class white Americans (Banks, 2012). Ideally the goal of multicultural education is to restructure schools, retrain teachers and staff, so that all students will gain the knowledge, outlook, and abilities required to succeed in America. In order to achieve the acceptance of a multicultural curriculum in all grades and infrastructure of the educational system must adopt this.
Education is what allows you to make the correct decisions in life and hence allows you to make a positive contribution to society as Nelson stated. Considering the rate at which our country is developing and has developed, the standard of education in this country is something that can't be taken as a joke and neglected. If America's educational system doesn't stop producing failures and cant motivate students enough to stay in schools to graduate, problems like poverty, high crime rates and
I think if those in charge would listen to the teachers more often our educational system would improve tremendously. The teachers are on the front lines and know what their kids need. A good teacher is not necessarily the one with the highest graduation rates. Rather, he/she is the one who best motivates students to value discovery and learning, and how do you measure that? From another perspective, others argue that the Obama administration proposal is determinedly rooted within No Child Left Behind philosophy of “measure and punish.” From their perspective this argument makes sense because not all the problems with schools should be blamed on
The structure of the education system is also structured on the idea that all people are born with the same mental capacity and intelligence, and it is the amount of effort that they put into their work that will determine the standard. School life also teaches correct attitudes and moral values, and is said to aim at creating a citizenry that is both literate and attuned to the basic values of culture and society. The academic achievement of Japanese students is high by international standards, and they consistently rank at or near the top in international tests like PISA. There are three types of education in Japan: public school, private school, and private schools that do not adhere to the standards set by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). School in Japan consists of kindergarten (yochien), elementary school (shogakkou), junior high (chogakkou) and senior high (koukou).