Two Theoretical Approaches To Identity

1104 Words5 Pages
Outline of two theoretical approaches to identity and how each has contributed to our understanding of this concept. Psychologists have studied identity in many different ways. Two theories on how our identities develop and are defined are the psychosocial theory of identity or Ego Identity and Social Identity Theory (SIT). The first was initially developed by Erik Erikson (Phoenix, 2002() through naturalistic and clinical observation and led to a view of personal identity as something which develops within a social context and is interlinked with it. Further developments to this were made by James Marcia (Phoenix, 2002) focussing particularly on adolescence and researching this through “the Identity Status Interview” (Phoenix, 2002). The second, SIT, was developed by Henry Tajfel (Phoenix, 2002) and researched by experimental method. It focuses on intergroup relations, group membership and social identity as something that is distinct from personal identity. This essay outlines these contrasting theories and explains how each has contributed to our understanding of identity with particular reference to identity in adolescence. Psychosocial or Ego Identity Theory Erikson believed that when there is a stable social environment we are less likely to have identity crises. In times of instability in the social context a person is much more likely to suffer an identity crisis. Erikson saw that all people go through crises and labelled these ‘normative crises’ (Phoenix, 2002) as opposed to those that people undergo at times of general crisis such as in wartime. Erikson advocated a theory of identity development that was based upon there being eight stages of identity development throughout life, these stages were hierarchical with the most crucial being Stage 5, adolescence (Phoenix, 2002). Adolescence, to Erikson, was a time when the developing individual

More about Two Theoretical Approaches To Identity

Open Document