The goal of FBA, regardless of which methods are used, is to answer certain questions: 1) Under what circumstances is the behavior most/least likely to occur (e.g., when, where, with whom)? 2) What outcomes does the behavior produce (i.e., what does the person get or avoid through his or her behavior)? To answer these questions, the information gathered must be analyzed and summarized. A variety of tools are available for data collection and synthesis. In many cases, an informal or abbreviated approach can lead to reasonable interventions.
They deal with “the how” of motivation. How did a specific process lead to an outcome of motivation? This information is important because it can show how the process may be measured and then replicated. It provides a way to explain how to motivate for change. One theory of motivation Bill Bailey might use is the process theory known as the Expectancy Theory.
You would have to rely on the patient giving you the information for it not is socially desirable or have demand characteristics. On the other hand, it is better than individual differences as people may have the same thought patterns and processes. You can only obtain this information by self reports, which would probably give both of those issues; social desirability and demand characteristics. These would affect your results and therefore they would not be reliable or valid. If you were using the cognitive approach you would only get qualitative data which could be a problem as not everyone interprets the same answer in the same way.
Furthermore, hypotheses must be testable by means of using if statements to make a point. The if statement in fact has a very good effect on manipulating one variable has on another. Hypotheses should also have a prediction, be testable, and have a certain falseness to it in order for it to be accepted. With that being said as well, it must also take into account current knowledge about the topic and the different techniques used to derive at a solution to the problem. Hypotheses actually use statistical and analytical data to ensure that it is verifiable, and this allows for the falsification or verification, in which I mentioned earlier.
Some people start listing steps with the hypothesis, but since a hypothesis is based on observations (even if they aren't formal), the hypothesis usually is considered to be the second step. The first step is to ask yourself what it is you want to learn about the topic or subject. The second step is to research information that can be used to support the solution to the question. The third
However, some results may be invalidated by the participants knowing either the true aim of the study or the fact that they are being studied at all. If the participant was to know the true nature of the study, they may adapt their behaviour in order to fit in (socially desirable) or they may act in a way that they think the researcher is expecting (demand characteristics). For example, in Milgram's electric shock experiment, it is highly likely that more participants would have delivered the higher shocks to the 'learner' if they had known the reality of the entire study. This makes the participants actions and behaviour unnatural and could invalidate the data completely. When considering this issue, sociologists should also consider that participants should also be offered the right to refuse.
Research Methodology Paper PSYCH 535 University of Phoenix Research Methodology When conducting research a researcher may use different scientific methods when studying an event. Research methodology is the process on how the researcher will describe how the information was gathered in order to conduct the research, such as interview or observations. A research method would be considered a good research if a researcher designs the research to get an accuracy result. Multicultural research focuses more on finding how an individual behavior is impacted by cultural influences. Multicultural research examines human behavior by using hypotheses.
How might a good research design be diagrammed? What kinds of threats to the validity of research designs can you identify? How can such threats be controlled or eliminated? Theories once proposed,need to be tested against the real world via a variety of research strategies, including experimentation and case studies. Research design have to consist of the logic and structure inherent in any particular approach to data gathering.
A deduction is evidence found through simple research to narrow down a more informative form of a theory; you can say it is an official theory or scientific guess called a hypothesis, with more evidence of the issues a hypothesis is formed from a theory using deduction. The next step will be achieved though the operationalization process in order to achieve a research design, the operationalization process puts number values on the research and may consist of precise measurements in order achieve a good research design ( found
They all have brief statements about what conclusions can be drawn from your study. What are different points you want your audience to consider when they see the data? 8. Many have some quotes or summarized statements from outside information sources such as interviews with health officials, university professors and staff, other studies, etc. What outside sources of information can you find to support both why it was important to do the study, why you got the results you did, and why you can logically make the conclusions you have drawn?