College students should get paid because of all the income they bring in for their school while playing. For example, in the article “Why College Athletes Should Be Paid” by Tyson Harnett he says “Many coaches earn at least $100,000 per year to coach one of the major basketball, baseball, football at a school. “They will receive bonuses for going to the playoffs, winning championships etc.” “You know what the athletes receive as a gift? Nothing.”(Harnett). Despite the significant help, college players have been for their schools and the revenue they bring in they get nothing in return.
When an athlete decides to pursue athletics in college, it shows that playing that sport is a passion of that individual and that they have worked hard to get to the point they’re at. It’s important that the NCAA begin to pay college athletes because without college sports, everything would be changed drastically for the NCAA as well as schools across the country. There are numerous reasons why student athletes in college should get compensated for their hard work, however, these are the three main reasons that will be discussed in this
It is very difficult to focus on school work, a division one sport and a job all at once. To help college students who play a sport the student should get paid. Being paid would have a very positive outcome for hard working athletes in many different aspects. Playing a division one college sport takes up most of the students’ time while they aren’t at classes. Between practices, weight lifting, running, watching film and games, a college athlete is always busy.
In the college sports its win or go home, and the winners get to celebrate their hard work. Opponents to paying college athletes proclaim that a scholarship to a higher learning institution should be sufficient compensation, however I believe that college athletes should receive a small amount of money for their hard work and time put into their institution. Hard work should pay off. The university should literally pay off their student athletes because it isn’t easy balancing classes and 2 or 3 a day practices. College athletes in all divisions put in hard work and dedication to both the education side and to the athletics side of their institution.
While others will argue back because they believe they earned all of the money and could be that some are stubborn and hard headed. So lets get on with this debate and you tell me your own opinion on why they get too much money or they earn every penny they get. So to start this debate we will go over the pro’s of getting paid this much money and why they do. For instance some believe they are not over paid due to the risk of injuries that could put them out of the sport the rest of their life giving the reason why they get paid so much money. Also some will say they deserve the check due to all the work they put into it, because when the season is over they are still training and getting ready for the next season.
The first time this question was asked was by Howard Savage, a staff member of the Carnegie Foundation. In 1930 he asked if such a big corporation such as colleges and universities can concentrate its attention on securing their teams to win while not paying the players who came to their schools for education in the first place. The answer is simple. College athletes should get paid for playing sports during their college career. One of the main reasons is that college sports are very popular and the attendance, especially at the football and basketball is growing every year and breaking attendance records.
Should College Athlete’s Get Paid? In recent years, the debate for college athletes to receive a salary has become very popular among the NCAA and its players. Football in particular, has become popular in this discussion. Arguments have been made both for supporting and disclaiming the notion of paying college athletes. The claims made by the two parties include whether or not athletes are employees, how much money is spent on athletes, and the effects of injuries.
According to Bhagat, one’s pay should be earned by economic importance and value. He compares an athlete’s salary to an average classroom teacher’s salary and concludes that a professional athlete should not have the higher salary. Since society’s future and economy depends of the education of our youth, Bhagat believes “Teaching is one of the most economically important occupations.” (1) He claims that the yearly salary of a regular school teacher is synonymic to each basket that Kobe Bryant, a professional basketball player in the NBA, scores. Bhagat disagrees with the argument that since professional athletes entertain millions of people across the globe, they provide society with more service rather than a teacher does teaching to students. Bhagat states that, “In order for these players to gain respect, they need to have a more significant impact on the community.” (1) Bhagat’s intended audience is the athlete’s team owners, made up of primarily men.
Should College Athletes be paid for their performance? More and more college athletes are becoming household names without shoe deals, video game endorsements or a weekly paycheck. And more and more often, people are asking if colleges and universities should pay student athletes. The answer is no. But should companies like Nike have to give student athletes a piece of their jersey sales?
How college sports affect education Abby Dyk 1. Introduction Have you ever thought athletics where valued more than schooling in your university? What makes these students viewed differently than the rest? The positive and negative effects of college sports have on education. College sports gives students an advantages in education due to GPA restrictions, study table times, and mandatory grade checks to continue with their sport and continue receiving scholarships.