Modernization Theory vs Dependeny Theory

1739 Words7 Pages
Modernization theory vs. Dependency theory By Philipp Marotzke 0000-42532 Rich World / Poor World DEV 4100 (A) Dr. Rafal Soborski 26th of November 2013 [Harvard] Throughout the last 50 years, the process of decolonization expanded across the whole globe and “underdeveloped” countries began to embark with varied projects to increase political, social and economical developments. Most of them started to create industries to export local services and goods, others moved up to national production for substituting imports (Joshi, 2013). The terminology of “development” as in economic growth is concerned, refers to industrialisation in terms of infrastructural changes such as highways and dams; internal social changes of moving away from traditional beliefs or practices, moving up educational systems on modern sciences; and political shifts such as creating efficient states to overstate decolonized domains (Graig, Hulme and Turner, 2007). The main idea of modernization involves those three-targeted aspects and became a dominant theory in the Western social sciences since the 1950s. Modernization developed into the origin of the evolutionary process for development (Joshi, 2013). Thus, the theory focuses on the deficiencies in the less economic developed countries and suggests possible solutions to overcome these deficiencies. It debated that about 500 years ago, most people in the poorer world lived in traditional societies and did not experience any entrepreneurship growth (Hewitt, 2000). During that time, the engine of economic growth was capitalism. Therefore, innovation and technological growth developed into a self-sustaining in Western Europe because they were adapted to the capitalist system. Hence, entrepreneurs were in competition, which pursued profits by lowering costs, expanding revenues, and re-investing in projects to increase
Open Document