Mgt600 Unit 2 Research Paper

4344 Words18 Pages
MGT600-1205A-05: Unit 5 – Unit 2: Biases & Judgment November 17, 2012 Abstract In this research project there are two very distinctive parts of this assignment, which uses the same hypothesis and Literature Review from my week one Individual Project (Part 2) assignment. I will compose a theoretical framework using the Step 4 of the Sekaran and Bougie process. I will also include a Scientific Research Design using the 5-1figure of Sekaran and Bougie, which is Step 6 of the Sekaran and Bougie process, for the hypothesis and Literature Review from my week one Individual Project and the theoretical framework that I prepared for Part 1 of this assignment. This research assignment will also include my assessment on the extent of "researcher…show more content…
I have organized these reviews into three distinct bodies of studies, each of them offer unique results and finding for the future of organizational team learning. The first study area owes credits, methods, and intellectual roots to the research on new processes in manufacturing and service operations. The second group originated with a laboratory and pursued questions relating to how members of small groups coordinate their knowledge and actions to accomplish organizational tasks of customer service. The third study area was performed in micro-level organizational behavior research, emphasizing interpersonal climate and group process and relied heavily upon methods that were developed in organizational research on team effectiveness and organizational survival. The three area remained separate during the time in which the research on-- organizational-team learning and its being considered a predictor of effective strategic management. Surprisingly, they did offer very distinct lenses on the varied ideas of team leaning within the organization being a predictor of effective strategic management;; each addresses a fundamentally different question, and each offers different concepts of team…show more content…
This is an area where team learning is viewed as an outcome of communication and coordination that was built off shared knowledge by its team members about their team, tasks, resources, and other contexts. Being more to the point, team learning is conceptualized as task mastering, and how well the team has learned its task is a normal way to measure its success. The research done in this area looks at how teams leverage their members knowledge and skills in order to increase the quality and amount of knowledge available for task execution. The center focus in this kind of work is encoding, storing, retrieving, and communicating information in teams (Wilson, Goodman, & Corrin). More or less put, this area of work amongst groups has found that teams that have members who know what each other knows is better able to perform interdependent tasks. In the papers that were reviewed learning was not defined in most task mastering areas, learning was treated as an outcome best measured in terms of task performance by paying very close attention to the mastering of new skills and/or tasks. There was a related area of research that was found that was on the effects of shared cognitive schemas on group decision making (Walsh, Henderson, & Deighton.1998; Gruenfekd,
Open Document