Literary Theory-" A Rose For Emily

1002 Words5 Pages
Sheena Jones Professor Valencic LITR330 October 20, 2011 “They said”, “We said”, “She did”: A Nosy Narrative Faulkner’s ingenious use of voice in “A Rose for Emily” gives it an old tabloid feel. At first glance, the title of this short story suggests that Emily was a much loved and adored woman; however, a rereading of the texts reveals that Emily was a source of intrigue and gossip for the people of Jefferson County. The story is told through an omniscient observer which is illustrated in the first sentence of the texts; “when Miss Emily Grierson died, our whole town went to the funeral, the men [out of] affection for a fallen monument, women…curious…to see the inside of her house,” (Faulkner); assuming that the narrator reveals this information about the townspeople in order for the reader to discern their purpose for attending was more to gawk and gossip rather than show adoration for Miss Grierson. The narrator is present but is merely reporting events as they happen. The townspeople’s curiosity is typical of what might be found in most small towns, their interests and entertainment lie within the personal lives of others. Emily just happened to be the only occupant of the town with status; it is obvious that she would become the object of everyone’s ridicule. It is like they were obsessed with her; “when she got to be thirty and still single, we were not pleased exactly, but vindicated,” (Faulkner). The Griersons, so rich and powerful, thought very highly of themselves, as a result, their daughter suffered, no man was good enough for Emily. Their “patriarchal chauvinism [and need for purity in] womanhood, [became a] conflict between community and [the] individual,” (Fang). These are some of the stressors a southern bell like Emily endured. Unfortunately, Emily’s battle with them left her alone and possibly, never knowing the “pleasure” of a man. The
Open Document