Compare/Contrast Classical China and India

796 Words4 Pages
China-v-India During the classical age, when nations were first able to develop individual, and unique cultures and traditions, the outcomes were shaped not only by political power, but also by the social atmospheres and customs created at the time. China and India had many of the same promising beginnings within their governing structures, and class relations. However, India progressed more in a cultural way, and China in a more politically based fashion. China and India continued to both have societal gaps, and central government success’ and failures, but the political and social divides kept them from paralleling religiously or economically. The regions had a lot in common socially from a wide perspective. Both nations had vast gaps between classes. The strict caste system in India kept the classes from interacting or shifting. The divide in China was based more directly on economic status than the sociable nature of the caste system. There was the main stretch between the wealthy or landowning class and the peasants, while in India it was a more intricate divisi. The gap caused most of the same problems and habits in each nation, though different in the details. The focus on agriculture created a huge working class, also referred to as peasants. Both societies were dependent on their peasants, although they didn’t always act like it. When one takes a deeper look into the workings of each culture, the specifics of religion and treatment vary widely. India, for the majority of its classical period, focused mainly on Hinduism as the primary religion. On the other hand, China had various separate religions throughout the country; such as Confucianism and Legalism. The reason Hinduism lasted as a more general religion, is because it included so many different gods and tolerated numerable ways of worship. Also, Confucianism and Legalism incorporated
Open Document