Antigone & Shooting an Elephant

683 Words3 Pages
An underlying, yet crucial theme in Sophocles’ Antigone, George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant”, and Cleo Parker Robinson Dance’s Southland were the difficult decisions inflicted upon the main characters in their quests for a ‘good life’. These decisions were ultimately the direct cost of their individual ideas of the ‘good life’, and cost some of the characters more than just their aspirations. The word cost in this context is best defined as ‘to cause loss or expenditure’. Antigone paid this cost when she made the decision to stand up for what was morally right, despite the demands of a higher power. The young Englishman who narrates Orwell’s essay is forced to make a decision based on what was popular, but not necessarily right. And sadly, the young black man depicted in Southland made the fatal decision to check on the injured white woman as she lay unconscious, in spite of the warnings of his friends. All three of the main characters are compelled to make imperative decisions, both because of and in spite of the demands of others, and these decisions become the cost of the ‘good life’ for all of them. Antigone and Southland both possess the shared importance of making morally sound decisions as the cost of the ‘good life’, despite the potential repercussions that accompany them, while “Shooting an Elephant” contrasts this by posing the issue of making decisions based on what is popular, although not morally just. The character of Antigone is symbolic of moral justice in Sophocles’ play, while King Creon stands for the law of the State. Creon thought that by using Polynieces as an example, he would be able to demonstrate the power of his reign and show that traders are not taken kindly to in his kingdom. Antigone disagreed with Creon’s decision to disrespect the body of her brother, and blatantly disobeyed Creon’s demands. Creon responded by giving her a cruel
Open Document