Vygotsky and Krashen

1031 Words5 Pages
1. A brief history of ELT 1. How are Krashen and Vygotsky similar in their perceptions on SLA? Answer: Krashen's input hypothesis resembles Vygotsky's concept of zone of proximal development. According to the input hypothesis, language acquisition takes place during human interaction in an environment of the foreign language when the learner receives language 'input' that is one step beyond his/her current stage of linguistic competence. For example, if a learner is at a stage 'i', then maximum acquisition takes place when he/she is exposed to 'Comprehensible Input' that belongs to level 'i + 1'.Vygotsky sees the Zone of Proximal Development as the area where the most sensitive instruction or guidance should be given - allowing the child to develop skills they will then use on their own - developing higher mental functions. Vygotsky also views interaction with peers as an effective way of developing skills and strategies. He suggests that teachers use cooperative learning exercises where less competent children develop with help from more skillful peers - within the zone of proximal development. Vygotsky speaks of internalization of language while Krashen uses the term language acquisition; both are based on a common assumption: interaction with other people. The concept of acquisition as defined by Krashen and its importance in achieving proficiency in foreign languages; is a perfect application of Vygotsky's view of cognitive development as taking place in the matrix of the person's social history and being a result of it. The distinct concepts in Krashen's acquisition theory and Vygotsky's sociocultural theory are complementary in providing resources for language teaching methodology. By explaining human language development and cognitive development, Vygotsky's social-interactionist theory serves as a strong foundation for the modern trends in applied
Open Document