Tv Censorship Bad Or Good

1051 Words5 Pages
Should Censorship be More or Less Strict? Censorship has been around basically since TV started, and ever since Elvis's provocative hip thrusts, censorship has been a debate about whether or not it was necessary. TV censorship in the past few years has been a hot topic of debate. With times changing in general it seems many things are becoming less strict, and TV censorship is one of those things. Some people say it's fine that culture now is more lenient. Some people are unhappy with the change and say TV is too provocative and should be more strict. Both sides have good arguments for their cause, so anything could happen to TV in the future. So the big question is, should TV censorship be more or less strict? In my opinion I feels like TV censorship should be more strict. Censorship is considered by some to be to lenient already. Many people see TV and wonder how some of the words being said are even being allowed to come out. People are unhappy with rules and regulations around censorship especially when the subject of children comes up. Basically people who want censorship to be more strict want, “protection of minors from pornographic material, protection of information/intelligence of National Security including information regarding the Military (weapons tech, enemy knowledge, etc.), promotes good morals, prevents grossly violent messages/events from being delivered, prevents spread of harmful information”.(Web pages) The subject most concentrated on is the protection of children but the other four things are taken very seriously. Parents are unhappy with some things their children are watching even on children' TV programs such as Nickelodeon and cartoon network. Not everyone feels like censorship should be more strict, that's why today this topic is a popular one to debate. “Personally, I think it should be less strict. In my opinion
Open Document