Evan Marshall was 31-years-old when he committed the murder. He lived in his parents’ in a gated community. He murdered and dismembered the body of retired teacher who lived across the street. He did not know the victim. The disappearance of Denise Fox, age 57, was first noticed by her daughter who found the back sliding door broken and blood on the floor when she returned home.
Decision of the Court: His charge was held and he was charged for the murder of his wife. Reasoning of the Court: If the suspect could destroy the evidence then at that time and manner it is constitutional to take the sample or whatever they may need. There was no formal arrest therefore it technically could also be allowed. Under these circumstances, the police are justified in subjecting him to the very limited search and seizure to preserve the evidence they found under his fingernail. Notes * Don’t need search warrant for fingerprints, voice, handwriting * Search to take place because of probable cause, not a full search b/c not arrested.
OJ had written a book called "If I did It" Where he lays out how he would have committed the murder. Why would anyone even want to write a book about the crime if you really had nothing to do with it? Simpson is protected by double jeopardy, he can't be put on trial for the crime again. He pretty much confessed everything about the crime in the book, but the cops can’t do anything about it now. The problem that made the prosecution lose the case was the fact that the police mismanaged the evidence and made the jury have enough doubt not to convict OJ
Then in 2007, is what the police believe, Sowell started killing the women he brought back to his home on Imperial Avenue. During Anthony’s childhood he was raised by his single mother. Anthony’s mother had three children, Anthony a daughter and another son. Anthony’s mother also took in her seven grandchildren. Sowell’s childhood consisted of watching his mother beat on his nieces and nephews while he and his brother watched, from a different room.
The Soledad Slayings By: Brett Plaskowitz Figure [ 1 ] Curleys wife dead on the floor in the barn I Brett Plaskowitz am one of the several editors of the Sycamore Sun Newspaper. Our most recent article “The Soledad slaughters” has caught the eye of many people in this small town. Although this is a small town there are quite a few ranches like the one these gruesome crimes were committed on. I have been editing this newspaper for 13 years and this is the most shocking article i have seen happen in this town. For those of you who don’t know what happened I will tell you: Tuesday of this week 2 bodies were discovered on a small ranch in our home town.
Though with the theory it does not prove on why he had gained traits from his father he could have instead learned these train from another person in his life at that time. Edwin Sutherland’s theory is much different than the social learning theory. Edwin believes that his interactions with others could have learned certain techniques and some values for some criminal behavior. Sutherland’s theory focuses on how people learn to become criminals instead why they are criminals. To this theorist he believes that Kulklinski have learned illegal actions when he was in mob
He also said in his statement that he had beaten the victim with a shoe, and the autopsy shows nothing of the sort. He could not describe the knife that was used to stab the victim in fact he had no idea she was even stabbed. Four months later Daniel Williams receives his results for the DNA testing and they are negative. Since Daniel confessed to something, he was still held responsible and the police closed the investigation. Months later, Unexpectedly Joe Dick, Daniel William’s roommate is now suspect number two.
Its hard for anyone to say that they would not do the same thing if they were in his position but that is not the question at hand, people want to know is what he did ok. Many people say there is no such thing as a justifiable act of murder and Carl Lee Hailey is a cold blooded killer who premeditated his act of murder and
Felony Voting Jonathan Vilcapoma California State University Fresno TOPIC: Felony Voting SPECIFIC PURPOSE: The purpose of this speech is to persuade others about that felony voting should be allowed. INTRODUCTION: Today ill be going over on why we should let felons vote. Felons have made mistakes in their life at a point where they might or might not regret. There punishment can be over a year sentence to jail, and losing their privilege to vote for mayor, president, or any sort of election. They are just like us, but for what they have done to become a felon must have been hard for them to make a choice like that.
While looking in the house an officer looked in a brown paper bag that he found in a cabinet. Inside was another one of the masks this one he recognized as the missing woman, Mary Hogan. She had been missing for over three years and had finally been found. Edward confessed to killing Bernice Worden and Mary Hogan he simply said that the rest of the body parts came from robbing graves but no one believed that such a small man could have dug up a body, opened the casket and covered it all up in one night. So the police decided to have one of the bodies exhumed.