Governor: Did you know that in 2003, the U.S. Government spent about $2,000,000.00 on potato research. Now why would the Government spend close to $2,000,000.00 on potato research when we have schools that need funding or when we have more important things like our debt to pay off but we go out and waste valuable money? I bet you that the U.S. Government got this money from another country and now it has added more to our debt. Reporter: Hmmm I never thought about that before. Governor: Yes most people haven’t but its okay because my mission is to bring back reassurance to the people on what happens when they vote people into Congress, we get this mess.
The decision to recall the trailers would be best for the Company and for society as a whole. When adding the pros and cons of doing nothing about this new found manufacturing flaws in the trailers, the cons out weighs the pros. With out a recall the company will see a 12,000,000-dollar increase in insurance premiums alone, with the loss of business and legal fees the business can potentially go under. The effects on society are even greater. With an estimated risk of 22 deaths that has the potential affected hundreds of people in society.
This would actually increase the level of democracy in effect but may completely defy the objective of politics. If elections were every 2 years, parties could not make any long term goals for the country in fear of losing the next general election. All policies would be short term and therefore not made for any good running of the country and just to gain popularity in the short term. This in turn may not enhance democracy, but lead it to a failing economy and government and may even lead to anarchism. Another potential way of increasing and enhancing democracy would be a compulsory vote.
Popular vote winners have been denied the presidency in 1824, 1876, 1888 and 2000. The Times once described the system as an 'antidemocratic relic', and there is enough evidence to support their view. Supporters of the electoral college se these elections as 'one-off anomalies', but a closer look at previous election results actually tells a different story. In 1976, a switch of a few thousand votes in Ohio and Hawaii would have returned the presidency to Ford, despite Carter being ahead in the popular vote by 1.7 million. Reality is that the electoral college can produce an undemocratic outcome, even if only rarely.
Rick Perry then later decided to send 1,000 guardsmen to the border to assist the Texas Department of Public Safety’s “Operation Strong Safety”. Critics of Perry’s move say the deployment is needless, because crime along the border is relatively low, and surge of Central American migrants over the last year — mostly unaccompanied children. Even though Critics of Perry’s say that his action was unnecessary, at least someone stepped in and took action unlike the Obama. Obama did have good intentions in helping the Mexico and Central America by trying to find a way to help improve the South’s economy to reduce the number of immigrants crossing the border and provide shelter for under age immigrants, but he delayed working with the immigration reform then eventually deciding to postpone the reform.
From this total, in 2010 the most part of this money was wasted on the commissions for stores selling these tickets, and prizes; the government received only $17.9 billion, which broke down to 30 percent in profits and 8 percent in administrative costs. In addition, lotteries can be seen as a hidden form of taxing; in 2009, 11 American state lotteries raised more money per person than corporate income taxes. Though people usually tend to see lotteries as a panacea against their unsatisfactory financial condition, in fact lotteries cannot save one from poverty or going bankrupt. In 2007, one of three lottery winners experience severe financial problems within about five years, and even lose all their capital. One of the main reasons standing behind this phenomenon is that despite suddenly gaining vast amounts of money, people do not revise their financial habits; moreover, rather often lottery winners spend money less
Not when prices would have to fall over 90 percent if they’ve been set in terms of Bitcoin. Falling prices sound like a good thing, but they’re not. If prices were to fall then people would procrastinate on buying things, when this happens and companies notice then companies stop investing. If companies where to stop investing, if that were to happen then the economy would get worse and people would get in debts that they can’t afford to pay because of the economy. If that was ever to happen then banks would not profit, which would lead to banks being afraid to make loans which would just make the economy get worse and prices would plummet.
To solve this market failure, government intervention seems to be the only feasible solution so far. The government can either subsidize or ban unpaid internships. However, subsidy is not reasonable because based on cost-benefit analysis. It costs the government too much to solve this market failure. On the other hand, banning unpaid internship opportunities is not effective because if business could not afford to provide internships, young graduates cannot gain experiences and provide positive externalities to the society.
(Thompson). Personally I would try not to play the lottery because it could get addicting. Last year Americans spent $73.5 billion on lottery tickets thats alot of money. The fact that $73.5 billion was spent on lottery ticket sales last year I think people are probably buying too many tickets. I think a single person should buy no more than 10 tickets.
Most people that think a higher education should be free are not very wealth but there are programs like financial aide to help them if they have the desire to get a higher education. If a higher education is just handed to them they begin to take things for granted and if that happens then they expect everything to be handed to them. So if America paid for the higher education of its citizens, America would not improve but eventually fail. Not paying for the higher education insures there will be service jobs; people that don’t have the desire to try in college will not waste the government’s money, and utilize