Here are a few more reasons why its a bad idea. First of all, if they raised the taxes no one would be happy. Many people buy snacks and pop from stores, if taxes are raised they may stop buying them and the store would lose business. If they continue buying it they would lose money. Either way it goes, nothing good happens.
Fewer companies are willing to enter the market because of the SOX requirements that make going public too costly. Plus, the maintenance required to stay public is too expensive for smaller companies, forcing companies to look elsewhere to raise capital. Rising costs persuade large numbers of companies to exit the public markets to sidestep SEC regulation, creates two problems. First, the overall economy could suffer because corporations limit investment projects due to the higher-cost sources of capital to fund potentially new operations. Second, financially stressed companies that go dark are the very companies’ shareholders need to monitor usually and where transparency is most important.
In my opinion it is a sick cycle, which enviably will reduce the standard of living in the United States. The individuals seeking to pay less for their purchases don’t realize the effect it has on the surrounding economy, including reduced wages, reduced community support, reduced business opportunity, reduced land values, reduced tax base, and ultimately lower standard and quality of living for most members of the community. I personally think that Wal-Mart is a modern day monopoly. It kills the competition. This is harmful for our economy.
In my personal experience I have not received a birthday card or thank you card in a long time. Now in days email is the fastest way to communicate in seconds .The world we live in today is fast paced and ever changing. If the United States service is unable to adapt to our changing society they will no longer have a place in it. The USPS needs to consider making changes to their systems or they will soon go out of business. The USPS has many important needs for the economy and record keeping of this nation.
If they put bad ratings on them, they wouldn’t sell! But they eventually couldn’t keep them high. Once the ratings went down, people couldn’t pay off their loans. They use the analogy of bubbles for economic problems. We have and now we have the bailout bubble.
Describe at least two negative outcomes of having too little money and credit in the economy. (2-4 sentences. 2.0 points) It would cause scarcity of currency, over balancing demand, producing too much of something meaning major markets could fall to the floor and would cause major losses for the companies producers. Describe at least two negative outcomes of having too much money and credit in the economy. (2-4 sentences.
But a country such as Turkey, seeing as no trade agreements have been made between them and the US, would not be so ideal because of larger tariffs and borders between the trading industries. As an economist, one must agree that there must be a delicate balance between outsourced industries and industries on the home front. It would be best to lean towards more American products so employment rates would be much higher, but with high employment comes great inflation. The costs of many products would skyrocket if we did not have industries that had very low employee wages in other countries. And if there is too much outsourcing, there would be no jobs.
Tea party members’ egos are getting in the way of any cooperation between Democrats and Republicans. Finally, if Congress failed to find a solution by Thursday October 17th, our nation could have very well defaulted on its debt, sending the economy further into a downward
In concern of the movement, not everyone is happy and Wall Street embraces deregulation, undoing many of the rules put in place in the wake of the Great Depression to limit banks’ riskiest investments. The limits on interstate banking are gone; down came the wall separating commercial and investment banks. Wall Street did not respect people; they had only themselves in mind how they could become richer and the common people poorer. Their virtues are in question, Wall Street should have a professional code of ethics these are the roles that are supposed to govern the conduct of members of their given profession. Which Wall Street did not have in place or this would have never happen.
• These all factors are affected by high inequality. • High inequality also reduces people accessibility towards resources even it threatens the political condition of the economy, discourages the behavior of people towards individuals or enterprises and this become the hinder towards economic growth. • If we talk about countries which have high growth but low living standard then I will prefer countries like India and China in both the countries there growth rate is rising but there standard of living is not that much high. • GNP is the value of product and services by a labor and property which is supplied by the people of that country and it is calculated in one year but it is not considered the way on which the wealth is distributed .in case of underdeveloped countries only one percent of the population is maybe controlling 80 percent wealth. • Economy may be expand and by this GNP increase at high rate but the people may not experience any of the change or rise in their living