Most teens at least 18 years old will have had more opportunities to learn an actually benefit from experience. Legal adults are held responsible and liable for their own behaviors; it’s likely that more mature drivers will show better judgment while driving instead of exposing themselves to injuries, legal damages and financial issues. Allowing 16 year olds a couple more years will help them gain maturity an better decision making. The higher driving age would also result in less traffic and possibly lower insurance rates. Every state is going to
Several ideas such as more distractions in the form of technology in the car and on the road, a lack of maturity and experience, and the fact that young people are more likely to be in a fatal car accident are all valid reason to raise the legal driving age. Some people do not believe age plays a factor in the ability to drive a vehicle by themselves without adult supervision. In a high school newspaper, Nowak (2004) said that “Raising the driving age would just make inexperienced drivers older and would solve nothing” (as cited by Yee, 2004). This is a good point, however, it is shown that the leading cause of death for 15-20 year olds is, in fact, auto accidents (Insurance Information Institute, 2015). Now why is this?
Several ideas such as more distractions in the form of technology in the car and on the road, a lack of maturity and experience, and the fact that young people are more likely to be in a fatal car accident are all valid reason to raise the legal driving age. Some people do not believe age plays a factor in the ability to drive a vehicle by themselves without adult supervision. In a high school newspaper, Nowak (2004) said that “Raising the driving age would just make inexperienced drivers older and would solve nothing” (as cited by Yee, 2004). This is a good point, however, it is shown that the leading cause of death for 15-20 year olds is, in fact, auto accidents (Insurance Information Institute, 2015). Now why is this?
Several ideas such as more distractions in the form of technology in the car and on the road, a lack of maturity and experience, and the fact that young people are more likely to be in a fatal car accident are all valid reason to raise the legal driving age. Some people do not believe age plays a factor in the ability to drive a vehicle by themselves without adult supervision. In a high school newspaper, Nowak (2004) said that “Raising the driving age would just make inexperienced drivers older and would solve nothing” (as cited by Yee, 2004). This is a good point, however, it is shown that the leading cause of death for 15-20 year olds is, in fact, auto accidents (Insurance Information Institute, 2015). Now why is this?
They would have more years of practice, be street smart and even be more prepared for driving later on in life in case of an emergancy where the adult is not able to drive. They could also learn to be more independent and be less likely to misuse their driving privilege. Also, Drunk drivers are the main reasons for car accidents. If you want to save innocent souls, make the punishment for DUI higher. Experience is what makes a driver good, not the age they get their permit or license.
Insurance will be expensive for a newer car because young drivers are less experienced. But for a used vehicle it could be less. Younger drivers do not acknowledge dangerous situations on the road, and therefore do not react appropriately. Although newer cars are more expensive they are equipped with more safety features like, (ESC) Electronic stability control and front- collision warning. Front collision may not be the most deadly for teens but they are type of
First, when teenagers get their driving licenses, and it’s hard for adult to be able to guide them. Most of these people are in high school or in college; they want to their own freedom. As soon as they get their driving licenses, they will have the feeling of being free and cool. This results in more self-confidence than is warranted. Their parents will not have control of their children the way they want.
Many people oppose the idea arguing eighteen to twenty year olds will only drink more if they are legally allowed to. The answer is simple: lowering the age will only lead to increased underage drinking, increased alcoholism and an increase in the number of alcohol-related traffic accident fatalities. Those in favor of lowering the drinking age argue that a lower age will reduce the appearance of alcohol as a “forbidden fruit” for those under the age of twenty one, therefore reducing the number of eighteen to twenty year olds who binge drink (Answering the Critics of Age 21). If the drinking age were to be lowered, the “forbidden fruit” would still exist, only to an even younger population. Fifteen to seventeen year olds will see their older peers drinking and will want to be included in the activity.
Leaving the drinking age at twenty-one will not necessarily stop underage drinking, but will definitely continue to disable many underage drinkers from drinking more. Finally, if teenagers being more prone to being seriously hurt, dropping out and/or going to jail, or even just hurting his/her athletic or academic potential is a good thing, then do not be one for lowering the drinking age to twenty
This makes them want to be a rebel and try out what it is they are being kept away from. The fact that they don’t know when they will be able to drink again is the reason most college students tend to get overly drunk when they get a chance which can lead to many serious problems such as death. Keeping the drinking age at 21 sends the wrong message that alcohol represents maturity, which leads teens to want to drink alcohol to appear more mature. If the drinking age was lowered there would be no peer pressure to drink, and young adults could learn how to handle alcohol responsibly at home from their parents. Another reason the drinking age should be lowered is because in the United States you are considered a legal adult at 18.