Should the Legal Drinking Age Be Changed

1307 Words6 Pages
In 1984 the United States passed a national law that required all states to impose laws restricting the purchase and possession of alcohol in public places to people under the age 21. This law is referred to as “The National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984”. Due to all of the accidents caused by drinking among people between the ages of 18 – 20, a provision was attached that required all states to comply or they would face a reduction in the federal funds allotted to them for the maintance of their highways under the Federal Highway Aid Act. Many felt that the provision on the national law was a form of blackmail. As a result it created a huge controversy over the issue and lead to the debate of whether or nor the legal drinking age should be 18 or 21 years old. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the 21 year old minimum drinking age law is needed in order to reduce the number of fatalities caused by young adult drivers (U.S. Department of Transportation, 1996). Those that are in favor of keeping the legal drinking age law the same claim that people between the ages of 18 - 20 are not mature enough to tell when they have reached their tolerance level, which causes them to make irresponsible decisions while under the influence of alcohol. Supporters of the law say that the main irresponsible decision made by many young adults while intoxicated is to operate a car. When this is done it increases the chances of them harming themselves and others if too much alcohol has been consumed before operating a vehicle. The problem that we find with this argument is that this is a irresponsible choice made more by drivers above the age 21 than those under the age of 21. Based on information I collected from the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, the rate of drunk driving amongst people between the ages of 21 to 25 was at 23.4%

More about Should the Legal Drinking Age Be Changed

Open Document