These student athletes definitely surpass that. These sports become less extracurricular and more of a lifestyle once they reach the collegiate level. They aren’t doing it just for “fun” anymore. They are doing it to hopefully pursue a career out of it as well as to assist them in paying for their education. In the past, college sports have been more amateur which is why they didn’t get paid.
(Morgan). So the players should get some of this money because without their contribution to the team they would not have as much popularity and revenue coming in. College players are not even allowed to work. So even if they have extra time to do so, they will have to sacrifice things such as meals, clothes, and
People who go to college now pay to go there and if they fail a class they just wasted a lot of money. If the government paid for everyone’s education then no one would think they would have to work hard and they would think they would have to work hard and they would end up failing once they moved in to there career. The only people that deserve to go to college for free are people that earn a scholarship or those who apply for financial aide. These programs are there for the people that have the desire to go to college. Most people that think a higher education should be free are not very wealth but there are programs like financial aide to help them if they have the desire to get a higher education.
During college, kids become adults and need to pay for their own things because their parents aren’t going to pay for them forever. Athletes may take out student loans and put themselves in debt. Paying college athletes would make them less dependent on their parents and more dependent to pay off their debts and for their own things. Not all college sports athletes have insanely busy schedules, but a lot do, like division one football or basketball players. Football and basketball are very popular and commonly watched sports around America.
Should College Athlete’s Get Paid? In recent years, the debate for college athletes to receive a salary has become very popular among the NCAA and its players. Football in particular, has become popular in this discussion. Arguments have been made both for supporting and disclaiming the notion of paying college athletes. The claims made by the two parties include whether or not athletes are employees, how much money is spent on athletes, and the effects of injuries.
But should companies like Nike have to give student athletes a piece of their jersey sales? Absolutely. The NCAA throws the word amateurism around far too often. There is a fine line between remaining an amateur and becoming a professional in the eyes of the NCAA. Turning pro does not guarantee endorsements and royalties; it simply means that an athlete will be paid to play for his organization.
The thing that they always told you was, “You don’t have to go to college because you are going to have a career in the trade that you chose”. A lot of people that I graduated with didn’t chose to go to college. They want you to think that the degree that they give the students is enough. There is no need to go to college because you have a degree. They also told us that college would cost too much money.
The answer is schools. Most of the time college athletes are as good as the professional athletes and since they don’t have as much time to dedicate themselves to the sport as the professionals, most of them don’t pursue their career in the future. Generally, the attendance at football and basketball games is growing every year in the NCAA, which is nonprofit association that consists of institutions, conferences, organizations, and individuals of many colleges and universities in the United States. It divides into three divisions of schools which brought a record number
The first aspect of the argument was that the college football program wastes much money appropriated from the slashed academic budgets (Buzz Bissinger 2012). In fact, the average students and players get no benefits from the college football program. However, coaches of a football team such as Nick Saban of the University of Alabama and Bob Stoops of the University of Oklahoma got obscene millions from academic budgets that should be used for academic purposes (Buzz Bissinger, 2012). Meanwhile, football facilities
College Admissions: College Acceptance Based On A Students Wealth If you asked most students what it takes to get into college, they would instinctively rehash what had been repeated to them over and over again: If you want to get into college, you're going to need good grades and extracurricular activities! But nobody ever told these students that there was a way to bypass these requirements and guarantee your admittance. It turns out that if you are able to, you can bribe a fair amount of colleges to admit you by giving them a sizable financial donation, I'm talking in the millions. Now some people will read this and automatically think that this is unfair and wrong, but I believe allowing colleges to admit students on the grounds of financial donations rather than academic and extracurricular merit is necessary in order to increase the quality of life for all current and prospective students and could lead to a change in the way we perceive college admittance. The giant donations received from these types of students can be put to great use, one of these uses is funding scholarships.