Saviour Children Theory

1501 Words7 Pages
As in the movie the lawyer Alexander Campbell rightly points out “The doctors started taking things from her the moment she was born. Cord blood as an infant, white – cell transfusions…. bone marrow, lymphocytes… injections to add more stem and then they took them too. But it was never enough.” From the moment the saviour sibling is born various genetic materials are extracted from his/her body. Throughout their lifetime the saviour siblings are required for various donations like bone marrow etc. Now this involves countless hours in the hospital both pre and post the surgery and there goes any chance of having a normal childhood. Anna clearly states this saying “I see other kids, I see what they do. They’re free to go to the parties, the…show more content…
They represent the utilitarian theory of ethics, which supports the greatest good for the greatest amount of people. This is a sort of vague definition in that it implies that sometimes one or more people may have to incur a loss in order to save a greater number. In this case, as a parent, it is one’s responsibility to look out for the safety and health of each of one’s children. If you need to create one to save another, than the parents probably think that not only will they save their child’s life, but they will also bring another child into the family, whom they can love for doing the one thing no one else can: curing his or her ill sibling. Following this train of thought, the parents might even believe that they are contributing to the promotion of life. When creating their savior child, parents have this in mind and even use it to justify their choice against those who do not believe in children being born to fulfil a purpose. They realize that although most people are against using PGD to create a saviour child, and they too possibly would have been only a few years ago, no one can understand what it is like to have a dying child and not being able to do anything at all to save him or her. When presented with even the slightest opportunity to save one’s child, how could one not take it? This guilt is the driving force behind the parents’ decision to use PGD; they will never be able to live with themselves knowing that they had one chance to save their child and they were too hesitant or scared to take it. And since parents are often more than willing to become donors themselves and not mind changing their way of living through invasive surgeries such as a kidney transplant, they may believe that any existing or new addition to the family is willing to do the same. The best way to summarize the dilemma faced by the parents

More about Saviour Children Theory

Open Document