Rite of Spring

1957 Words8 Pages
Seeing Is Not Always Believing Leo Stravinsky’s ballet The Rite of Spring caused quite the uproar in Parisian society in 1913. Both the music and the dancing were unlike anything the public had ever seen. Dissonant chords, brash instruments, and ungraceful movements by the dancers all contributed to the audience’s unease at this “ugly” music. The public disliked The Rite of Spring so much that they almost caused a riot at its premiere! One may ask, “Why all the fuss? How could this ballet possibly apply to me or today’s society?” For starters, Theodor Adorno, a 20th century sociologist, wrote extensively on what he considered to be “popular music”. He even went so far as to say that this “popular music”—which includes The Rite of Spring—could lead to positivism, which then leads to fascism (“What National Socialism Has Done to the Arts” 378). Adorno backs up this rather bold statement by claiming that family values have decreased, which contributes to a belief in positivism among younger generations. Because this belief is the first step to Adorno’s idea of a fascist society, my argument will focus on positivism. Positivism is the belief in scientific objectivity. Our society seems to have adopted this philosophy and completely disregarded spiritual beliefs and art as expressions of Truth. Contradictory to what Adorno believes, I think that The Rite of Spring is important because it emphasizes spiritual roots. The dancers are celebrating the Earth and are willing to sacrifice everything for their beliefs. We need to be able to step back from this sense of “seeing is believing” and embrace the beauty of a more basic Truth. Before we delve into this argument any further, we need to establish some key terms. Friedrich Nietzsche, a 19th century philosopher, describes the difference between the Greek gods Apollo and Dionysus. In chapter 1 of his book The Birth of
Open Document