These doctors were in a no-win situation because Hitler was ordering all people that fell in a certain category to be executed or become one of the Guinea pigs for the experiments. Hitler’s government was in control of the notorious acts committed by these doctors. The doctors could have said “NO” but they ran a risk of being killed or lose their privileges to practice. Many psychiatrists did not have the courage to openly oppose to the so-called, medical- killing project. So the question is, “Can this Science be considered GOOD Science?” The answer is yes, because to rule out the data collected and act as if it didn’t exist would be unethical because it offers authenticity of the experiments performed.
Other than that, it was not easy for George to shoot Lennie but he had to do it because if he didn’t he knew that Curley would and in a more painful way. Therefore George had to make the sacrifice and be the one who shoots Lennie himself so that Lennie wouldn’t have to suffer. Without Lennie, George also faces other problems on his own such as loneliness with no one to care for and no one to care for himself. Steinbeck’s characterization plays an important role in showing how Lennie himself brought him to his own death. On page 2 of the novel, Steinbeck gives a description of Lennie: “Behind
A vibrant selection That we will all die as we know, even though many do not want to talk about it. The only question is when and how. We all take responsibility for our own lives. Do we not also take responsibility for our own death if given the opportunity? In politics, the question of euthanasia really taboo laid.
A lot of the captives including Elie, started to curse God and stop Rosh Hashanah. That was exactly what the Germans wanted: to erase all identity the Jews had for themselves. But even after having these thoughts, they made time to pray. To keep their spirits alive and even if they were in the worse condition imaginable, they were able to keep their fate. Elie’s father plays an important role in this story.
Abstract The formidable psychology behind the experiments conducted by the Nazi doctors of the Third Reich, at times, may be difficult to fathom. However, in the book Nazi Doctors (2000), the author, Robert J. Lifton, is markedly dexterous in his addressing of such a concept. “Killing someone already dead need not be experienced as murder. And since Jews, long the Nazis’ designated victim, were more generally perceived as carriers of death, or bearers of the death taint, they became “doubly dead.” Just as one could not kill people already dead, one could do them no harm however one mutilated their bodies in medical experimentation” (p. 151). When Good Doctors Go Bad: the psychology behind the Nazi experiments of the third Reich Why did Hitler’s Nazi doctors, if they were among the top in their profession, precariously abuse the field of medical experimentation by using humans as their subjects for perverse experiments?
It made many of them realize that the enemies were just like themselves. “What we had found gave to the enemy the humanity I wished to deny him” (124). Although they were all taught to kill the enemy and were prideful in doing so, they were not taught to cope with the guilt and remorse they felt after their actions. Many of them did not know how to make sense of it
That is what a lot of people asked themselves and still ask themselves until this day. To put it briefly, Fussel’s argument states that war was savage for invasion forces and killing civilians of Japan was the only way to avoid a Japanese invasion. In complete disregard to civilian lives, he believes the atomic bomb may have killed many but that it saved many more. Walzer believes that dropping the atomic bomb was inhumane and that war is all about the choices that you make. Walzer makes many valid points that forced me to change
Hitler was a great leader in a horrible way. These days most people believe that Hitler was a nasty person because of the holocaust he created but what did people think about Hitler during his days. Powerful, a person who spoke out his thoughts, which all were good ideas to the Germans and so eventually he climbed up the hierarchy ladder and reached the top and in 1933 he became the Chancellor of Germany. Hitler was strongly against the Treaty of Versailles. He didn’t like the fact that 15% of their land was taken by all the winning countries.
Due to the Depression making people want a drastic change in political party in ower there was an increase in communist support and as a result an increase in Nazi support because people were scared of communism and the Nazi's promised to deal with them. The depression was taken advantage of by Nazi propaganda and they convinced a lot of people that electing Hitler would solve their problems. This means that the Depression was the most important factor in the election of Hitler because with out it then nobody would want to change the current party in power because before the depression then German was extremely prosperous. Therefore, the Depression was the most important factor that lead to the election of Hitler. It could be argued that the Hitler attributes was the most important reason for why Hitler was appointed Chancellor in 1933.
I need to look into it more but were we oppressing them in some way over sees? I know they attacked us because like most rebelling groups they can’t take on a power like the USA head on. So they attacked in other ways which were obviously successful. I just never understand why they tried in the first place. They had to have known they would lose.