Of Peter Lewiston Against The Eeoc's Definition Of Sexual Harassment

338 Words2 Pages
1. Evaluate the conduct of Peter Lewiston against the EEOCs definition of sexual harassment. According to EEOC it is unlawful to harass a person because of that person's sex. Harassment can include "sexual harassment" or unwelcome sexual advances, request of sexual favors, and other verbal or physical harassment of sexual nature. From my point of view when I evaluate the case I come to the conclusion that whenever the person feel uncomfortable with the approach and they try to stop the other person, without any luck, it is harassment. In This case Mrs. Gilbury clearly stated to Mr. Lewiston that they were just friend and that she was happily married. This could have been more than enough for him to stop his behavior, but no, he continued

More about Of Peter Lewiston Against The Eeoc's Definition Of Sexual Harassment

Open Document