Each situation and each person must be assessed on their own merits (Thiroux, 2004, p. 42). Since we cannot look at each client individually to determine whether or not Dr. Smith’s confidentiality policy is morally justifiable (it may be for one client, but not for another), we cannot properly answer this question using act-based utilitarianism. Rule-based utilitarianism, on the other hand, changes the basic utilitarianism’s principle from “everyone should always act to bring about the greatest good (i.e., “happiness”) for all
When writing, knowing how to write a summary, paraphrase, and quote a source is key conveying your ideas without plagiarizing someone else’s. While developing a summary there are some key things to remember. When you are summarizing someone else work you must read and understand the authors work. Without understanding the context and main points of someone’s work you will not be able to put it into your own words. Although it is unreasonable to think that while writing a summary someone can be completely objective, that is the goal.
* Understand how opinions are formed and try to be in conscious control of the process; do not treat your opinions as facts; monitor your thoughts to prevent the uncritical default mode from taking charge. * When Ruggiero uses the word “opinion,” his major emphasis is on which of the following: * A considered
Critical Thinking Application MGT/350 August 20, 2013 Critical Thinking Application Making a sound decision can be complicated enough by not following an appropriate decision making process. A decision is a choice between two or more alternatives. When an individual has a choice, decision making can be time consuming but may not require critical thinking. When thinking critically, the individual will consider all possibilities of the matter and its resolution, including how the decision may affect others involved. Applying critical thinking in the workplace expands the thought process opening the mind to develop ideas, make more acceptable decisions, and lesser mistakes.
In a sense, critical thinking is a form of analysis and determination of fact vs. fiction, identifying the unknown, coming to an understanding, etc… By taking the path of a critical thinker, a person develops a mental process of evaluation which helps to determine their ethical standards. By incorporating the critical thinking process into their mindset, it enables them to more effectively make decisions based upon truths and verified information, rather than unknowns and variables. By eliminating the variables, you bring to view the plain truths which exist and make a decision based upon that . Having a critical approach to ethical analysis is very important and remains one of the principle factors as far as I am concerned I think that people should have a very analytical mind if they are to be truly successful ethically, because it is too easy to forget and not care; resorting to self sufficient forms of thinking
This can be hard to accomplish when individuals misperceive what is morally right with other moral agents such as self-interest, personal desires, and peer/community beliefs. “Because of complexities such as these, ethically motivated individuals must learn the art of self-critique, of moral self-examination, to become attuned to the pervasive everyday pitfalls of moral judgment: moral intolerance, self-deception, and uncritical conformity. The rules and principles of critical thinking do apply to ethics because they both follow the same guidelines. Critical Thinking helps people determine for themselves whether something is right or wrong. It is a form of analysis and determination of fact vs. fiction, identifying the unknown and coming to an understanding.
This approach was developed by philosopher Martin Heidegger who proposed that knowledge is gain through social interaction and interpretations (REF). Mapp (2008) suggests this will allow the researcher to bring their own experiences to the study. This approach is contrary to Husserl’s approach of bracketing whereby the researcher puts aside their views and knowledge of the phenomenon so as not to affect their findings (petty, 2012). This approach was omitted from use as the concept of bracketing can be hard to achieve rigorously as the researcher would have to be fully aware of all judgements and pre conception they have prior to the study in order to apply bracketing successfully (REF). Polit and beck (2009) state that phenomenological studies explores individuals lived experiences of a particular subject and seeks to gain better understanding of this phenomenon from the perception of those who have experienced it.
Chapter 6 The Self ExErcisE 6.1 Self-Assessment: Self-Monitoring Scale Instructions The statements below concern your personal reactions to a number of situations. No two statements are exactly alike, so consider each statement carefully before answering. If a statement is true or mostly true as applied to you, mark T as your answer. If a statement is false or not usually true as applied to you, mark F as your answer. It is important that you answer as frankly and as honestly as you can.
Which thinker best describe you? You can easily go from one stage to another stage once you enhance your thinking skills. Critical thinking is your own opinion but you have to think outside the box to get answers. There is no right or wrong answers in critical thinking but you have to go beyond your reasonable doubt and come up with your own logical answers. Critical thinking is a good way to believe in yourself and people around you.
A dilemma whether it be moral or ethical and steam from a lot of different reasons. Depending on how people go about dealing with and managing these two issues is the only thing that determines the results. When there is a person that makes a decision and the different options that they chose from that makes it unpleasant can be considered a personal moral. The ultimate task is to actually pick from the options when you don’t really agree with it. When someone has to make a decision about something they use their past experience in order to come about their conclusion on the situation.