There is a moral difference between Shelton’s killing of his attackers and that of his other victims. Darby and Ames caused personal harm to Shelton and thus gave him the moral right to try and prevent any other future pain that could be caused by these men, but the other victims were combatants in the war that Shelton waged against the “system”. When looking at Darby and Ames, Shelton takes a more utilitarian approach when dealing with their killings. The government “system” is supposed to punish those who are wrong. But in the trial of Darby and Ames, only Ames was punished severely while Darby was allowed to go free.
It guides them to make the correct ethical decisions in life fulfilling their role as Christians. Ethics is the decision between right and wrong influenced heavily by beliefs and responsibilities of an adherent. Through the Bible, teachings by Jesus through parables such as the ‘Good Samaritan’ educate them on the way they should behave in everyday situations. In this parable, a man is neglected by a priest and a Levite but is helped by a Samaritan, a person who was disliked in that time. It shows Christians that they should help everyone who is in need, leaving no one behind.
By observing and keeping the word of God. 27. How could Jesus speak with confidence of his weak disciples “in the perfect tense?” 17:10. Bruce, p. 331. He did this because it is God who had chosen them and they are his and Jesus had been glorified among them.
Henry VIII deserves to be remembered as ‘Horrible Henry’? My essay is about whether Henry deserves to be remembered as ‘Horrible Henry’. One important point I’ll be making is that he does deserve that, because of some of the terrible things that he did in his life that I will be explaining in more detail further on. I will also be considering that he doesn’t deserve that image and that he did good things throughout his life. I think Henry VIII does deserve his image as ‘Horrible Henry’ as he did many bad things throughout his life.
If Rainsford had chance to leave and didn’t because he wanted to kill the man who hunted him do you think that is wrong. I do. I believe he was wrong because he turned into another Zaroff. Next, i believe he was wrong because he lost his humanity and became a beast like Zaroff. Finally, I believe he was wrong because when Zaroff shot humans it was wrong and we thought he was savage ,but wasn’t Rainsford doing the same thing when he shot Zaroff that was a savage and in our minds we try to justify that when it was just as wrong.
Macbeth can be seen as a tragic figure, but he shouldn’t t be treated as a complete tragic figure. Although Macbeth does have our sympathy, he also has our bitterness. He killed King Duncan, Banquo and Macduff s family not only because of the circumstances, but also for the sake of his greed for honour and nobility. His greed caused his own country to be filled with fear, grief and unhappiness, which is personified in one of Malcolm s speeches that makes us feel the pain Scotland, is feeling: Malcolm: I think our country sinks beneath the yoke; It weeps, it bleeds, and each new day a gash Is added to her wounds. We feel sad for Macbeth s death, but we also feel happy that he was executed.
Sin reveals its effects in personal and relational pain of all sorts, in addiction, neuroses, psychoses, strife, imbalances, negativity, conflict, etc. Pain in these forms is not the primary problem of man, though it is often an observable symptom of the deeper problem. Psychological and relational pain are indicators that something more important has gone awry, that the shalom we were built for has been broken. Something has usurped the place of our dependent loving trust in God, badly warping our intended design. No longer are we living for the glory of God, to know and love him and one another.
And they were senselessly murdered just because they were different. Nothing today can compare to the holocaust because it was so massive and unforgettable. But the holocaust has taught us about how people need to treat each other. If people start to treat each other like the Nazis did the Jews there is no stopping another holocaust from happening again. The Nazis were judgmental raciest and disgusting people who hated anyone who was different then them.
He went too far. He also doesn’t know that his revenge will also hurt him. He won’t go to heaven because he killed someone. This story is also saying something that is true. Revenge is sweeter when the person least expects it.
Evident in the transition of John Proctor as he is filled with guilt and remorse for his adulterous behaviour, ‘ I would rather cut of my hands than touch you (Abigail) again,’ yet it is through his condemnation and heroism in his death that he is finally able to forgive his sins symbolised by Elizabeth’s statement, ‘he have is goodness now’. Through the characterisation of John Proctor Miller encourages us to understand the social pressures that the minority face in order to bring justice, to a situation when controlled by a repressive