Hudson's Bay Company V. White Case Summary

1029 Words5 Pages
STATEMENT OF FACTS On November 7th 1999, two youths shoplifted goods worth of $4.40 and $11.16 from an 11-Seven store owned by Northland Corp. The two individuals Brat Simpson ; 15 years old and Arty Dodger ; 16 years old were convicted for a youth crime under the Youth Offender’s Act and sentenced to return the goods and serve twenty community service hours each. Northland Corp. has experienced severe losses due to shoplifting over the past nine months with combined costs of security, a loss prevention group, and lost goods totaling to $1, 002, 919, 00. These costs are incurred from 32 stores across Calgary owned by Northland Corp. They’ve paid their Loss Prevention Group $57,129.12 to minimize shoplifting as well as overseeing the…show more content…
Brat Simpson and Arty Dodger case. However, there is a similar case in terms of the damages being sought, the Hudson's Bay Company v. David James White case. In this case, the Hudson's Bay Company sued Mr. White seeking punitive damages and damages for the surveillance, investigation and apprehension of Mr. White arising out of his shoplifting activity. In the result, the plaintiff was awarded "…judgment for trespass against the defendant in the nominal $300.00. The judge in the Hudson’s Bay Company case awarded the plaintiff damages for surveillance and investigation; this is similar to what is being sought in the Northland Corp v. Brat Simpson, Arty Dodger case, the action against the defendants is for the amount of $750.00 for the “cost of security, prorated between offenders caught shoplifting within the store and the amount owing remains a just debt improperly withheld by the Defendants.” The only reason the judge in the Hudson’s Bay Company case gave for awarding the damages was that, "…the case cries out for an award of punitive damages”. The cost of shoplifting is very high, it cuts into the profit margin of the retailer and is paid for by the consumer. It requires stores to invest in more complex means of security. This could be the reason why the judge in this case felt

More about Hudson's Bay Company V. White Case Summary

Open Document