How Successful Was the League of Nations?

718 Words3 Pages
The League of Nations was set up to ensure the devastation of World War 1 should not be repeated. The Leagues aims were to discourage aggression from any nation, to encourage countries to co-operate especially in business and trade, to encourage nations to disarm and to improve the living and working conditions of people in all parts of the worlds. Some did not work but others were successful. The aim of discouraging aggression between nations was successful sometimes but failed on the other times, countries were encouraged to go to the League if they felt a country were being aggressive with them. One of the unsuccessful time was with Vilna in 1920 when Vilna the capital of Lithuania had a majority of Polish population, which was occupied by Polish army which refused to leave. Lithuania protested to the League, but the League failed to make Poland leave so in the end the League did nothing showing it was unsuccessful. However, the League succeeded with Upper Silesia in 1921 which contained a large number of Poles and Germans so both countries wanted it as it would help their economic problems so they went to the League for help. The League split up the country between Germany and Poland and both countries agreed, this was successful. This shows that they were unsuccessful and successful with this aim. Another aim of the League was to encourage countries to co-operate especially in business and trades which was unsuccessful. International treaties were made in the 1920's and one of them was The Dawes Plan in 1924, this was USA lending money to Germany to help it pay its reparations bill. This was successful as Germanys economy rose, which meant it was less likely to start a war. Also trading with Britain, France and others countries gained more money, Americas loans to Germany helped increase employment which then increased international industry, which then
Open Document