How Successful Was the Lon in the 1920´S?

1131 Words5 Pages
The League of Nations was succesful during the 1920´s, but not always. The League had some aims which were: to discourage aggression from any nation, to encourage countries to co-operate especialy in business and trade, to encourage nations to disarm, to improve the living and working conditions of people in all parts of the world, to reinforce the terms of the treaties were carried out. Although there were also different kind of problems that the League had to deal with, the most important one is that the USA didn´t join the League of Nations. In Upper Silesia, 1921. The Germans and the Poles argued because each country wanted to take control of this region and they were fighting for it. The League divided Upper Silesia into two regions between industrial and rural areas, building many saveguards to prevent future disputes, which linked the two countries providing them water and power supply. The League also sent troops and made a votation. To the rules imposed by the League, both countries accepted the decision and prevented future disputes However, in Vilna, 1920. The Polish army took over Vilna, Lithuania´s capital, because the population was largely Polish. Because of this, Lithuania appealed to the League. The League protested to Poland, but they couldn´t send troops because the French and British acted with self-interest. The Poles refused to accept the League´s decision and kepted Vilna. By the other hand in the Aaland Islands, 1920-1921. Between Sweden and Finland. These two countries wanted to take control of it threatening to go to war. But before this, they appealed to the League. The League studied the case and said that the land should go to Finland but the islanders should govern themselves. Sweeden accepted the League´s decision and the war was avoided. Also in Austria, 1922. The Austrian government was facing economic problems after the
Open Document