How Far Do You Agree That Garibaldi Was the Most Important Individual in the Unification of Italy?

585 Words3 Pages
While there were many crucial factors to the Italian unification, in terms of individual impact I feel that Garibaldi was indeed the most important. His involvement in capturing the Two Sicilies, gaining popular support and weakening Austria made him an essential figure in the unification. However, it is also necessary to give credit to others such as Cavour and Mazzini who were more important in gaining foreign support and raising national consciousness, respectively. Garibaldi is different from other notable figures of the unification in that he was popular among the ordinary Italians. His popularity is evident upon considering that he was able to convince the Sicilians to fight and vote for a unified Italy despite previously being separatist. It is unlikely that any of the other notable individuals could have rallied the Italian populous in a similar way. As such Garibaldi’s importance in this matter is undeniable. While Garibaldi was clearly the most important in mobilising the population, Mazzini may be considered to have had a greater impact in raising national awareness in the first place. After all, it was Mazzini who, through Young Italy, introduced Garibaldi to the idea of nationalism. Furthermore many believe that Mazzini publications were essential to the rise of the nationalist movement. However, upon considering that the majority of the Italian population were illiterate we can only assume that Mazzini’s actual impact was minimal. One aspect of the Italian unification, in which Garibaldi playing a relatively small or non-existent role, is that of gaining foreign support. Cavour, on the other hand, was essential to foreign negotiation as in the summer of 1858 he made the Pact of Plombieres with Napoleon III. The pact was secured French support in the war against Austria, was indispensable to Italian unification as the pre 1849 revolution had shown
Open Document