One way is that Iorek has many great battle strategies and is smart in the way that he can outsmart people lower and higher than him. Lord Asriel is very smart and unpredictable in the way that he is scientific and futuristic. He looks at what he could do to make us modern. But yet again I state clearly; they are both intelligent. My opinion on who is more a true father to Lyra is clearly made already.I think Iorek is more a father because Lyra loves him more,for example,the scene where Lyra is talking to Serafina Pekkala in
Twain had selected a very formal language and chose the words precisely. The opened paragraph had used formal language and had a normal speed which suggested it was a pleasant and enjoyable story. The opening paragraph caught the reader’s interest, so Twain had started his story successfully by using the formal and pleasant style of writing. The author had described Tom as a very unfortunate and poor boy that had beaten severally when he came back empty-handed from begging. The author also gave a detailed description of Tom’s filthy and dirty clothes.
The director shows this by the sounds and angles of the camera during scenes and by the way many people talk at once shows the differences of life between the city and the peacefulness of Samuels home. The close up on Samuel’s face during the murder with the expression of terrified face with a wide open eyes and the tension of the music shows us the corruption of his innocence and the conflict with the world around him there is also another evidence when he tells Eli that he would only kill the bad man. Schaefer, McFee and Fergie go to the Amish world looking for john book they are faced with many obstacles. When thewy first enter arrive at the farm, the soundtrack and the close up view on the guns are there to remind us the violence and show us that that is the only way they could keep their corruption. The gun fires between John Book and McFee are there to represent the violence and even earlier in the film at the parking area, the guns are used as a symbol of thriller and crime.
Fitzgerald aims to build a sense of trust and so portrays characters as well educated and enlightened, as such that Nick is ‘inclined to reserve all judgments’ and being ‘privy to the secret grief of wild, unknown men’. This forces the reader to trust Nick’s retrospective recollections; and the fact that the reader is aware of how his perceptions may have been altered by future knowledge or the erosion of memory through time indicates this memoir may be an edited version that is not completely reflective on the true events. Fitzgerald clearly sets the setting of the whole novel: the West Egg and East Egg, it is arguably said that it could be referred to the history of the Christopher Columbus story. This enhances the imagery of an egg as the start of a new life; Nick felt that ‘life was beginning over again’. Moreover, Fitzgerald allows Nick to point out the superficial similarities between the two communities, revealing differences gradually; extravagant wealthy people populate both Eggs and to the outsiders they are a source of ‘perpetual wonder’.
The language itself is very simple and straightforward, written to mirror his characters. Steinbeck writes simply as the men would speak, and lets the content of the book come through via the dialogue. The sparse descriptions of the men and environment, gives room for personal interpretation of the characters based on their actions and relationships. In some way though, Steinbeck still manages to keep our sympathy for the two protagonists throughout the book, even when Lennie kills Curley’s wife or when George recalls his bullying of Lennie. Set in the Great Depression during the 1930’s, the story takes place near Soledad in the Salinas Valley of northern California.
Blake uses subjective personal experience and evidence in dramatic context to inform his audience the state of the city. He shows several instances, such as “The mind-forg’d manacles I hear” (line8), to tell the reader what he has personally experienced these events. Also,” in every Infant’s cry of fear” (line 6) Blake endures dramatic context placing a sad setting to the poem. Blake lists how chimney sweepers go through and how dangerous it is for them for their future,” How the youthful Harlot’s curse” (line 14). On the other hand, he mentions soldiers struggling pain with their families “And the hapless Soldier’s sigh” (line11), and thinking that they can’t do anything about it.
Throughout the novel he treats her like an object to be conquered and controlled, expecting nothing more (and nothing less) of her than to be quiet and pretty. This becomes clear very early on in the novel; what is less clear is Osmond’s reasoning or motivation behind his obsession with being in control of Isabelle. His speech and thought processes, however, reveal that his rationale behind his overbearing possession is directly correlated to his love of collecting art. He, simply put, is a collector of fine things. One of the first moments in this novel when Osmond’s desire to collect things beyond inanimate art is first alluded to is when Ralph tries to politely describe him to Isabelle in Chapter 34.
He manages to incorporate English and Spanish with ease with his protagonist Robert Jordan. It is with this I will show just how important this bilingual diction was important to not only Hemingway but to Robert Jordan as well. In the following passage of his novel For Whom the Bell Tolls Hemingway expresses a sensitivity to the suggestive value of words in themselves which I conceive to underlie his whole handling of language in the book. His American protagonist, Robert Jordan, thinks “And if . .
Next the people of the pavement sees Richard Cory as a “gentleman from sole to crown” (Robinson 3). Richard Cory is a man that people admire. On line 4 the poem describes Richard Cory as a handsome man he is “Clean favored, and imperially slim”. In addition to being a well seen person, Richard Cory is also under pressure of having to be well fit. According to Charles Sweet Richard Cory’s is seen as a king as the poem associates him with a “Crown” and the people with “pavement” (Sweet).
This structure enables the poet to retell the story and within each new stanza Wordsworth adds more information with regards to the disappearance in a simple, communicative manner. This enables him to create a story-like form which is easy to understand. The sound pattern follows the traditional abab rhythm associated with Literary Ballard’s and is present throughout with no deviation. Within the Literary Ballard Sibilant alliteration is used creating soft gentle sounds ‘the sweetest thing that ever grew’…‘the sweet face of Lucy Gray’. The repetition of these sounds creates a mournful pattern of melancholy and sadness surrounding the disappearance as the reader if forced to acknowledge Lucy’s sweet and innocence and that she did not deserve her fate like many other children who disappear under similar, mysterious circumstances.