During George Washington’s term, Hamilton and Jefferson disagreed with each other’s views of how the government should run. Jefferson was very strict with staying and adhering to the Constitution, while Hamilton wanted to form new policies that would further progress the economy. Furthermore, foreign affairs such as beginning with the policies towards the French Revolution became a motivating force for influencing American politics. It had then seemed very obvious that these were factors that lead to the success of American politics. In the early 1790’s Washington was elected for president and Alexander Hamilton came along with him.
This power caused principles in Jacksonian Democracy including Manifest Destiny. The idea of Manifest Destiny basically is the belief that America has the power to expand its borders to the western land and all of America from the Pacific Ocean to the Atlantic Ocean. This is destiny that was given to America from God supposedly and Jacksonian Democracy completely defends it. Also, Jackson believed in a limited federal government even though he wasn’t satisfied on the idea of a strong state government. Jacksonian’s agree with a “hands-on” approach to the economy meaning that the government to strong control over the countries economy.
Outline Although the founding of the Constitution was a revolutionary, positive turning-point in American history, the US Constitution has a few unconstitutional and democratic shortcomings. Introduction In order to understand the shortcomings of democracy of the US Constitution, is it is important to know the background of its’ founding and how each article serves our country. Federalist No. 10, written by James Madison, asserts the importance of having the image of a democracy without its real substance. There seems to have been a very strong opposition towards democracy at the Constitutional Convention, although the framers were in the midst of creating democratic principles to appeal to the majority of the country.
The Two Political Parties Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton had a great rivalry not only political but also personal, this rivalry is what led to the two political parties, the Federalists and the Democratic Republicans. The Democratic Republicans and the federalist evolved from the Federalists and Anti Federalists, the Federalist that wanted to ratify the Constitution, while the Anti Federalist wanted to stay with the Articles of Confederation. After many heated debates the Federalists won and the constitution was ratified. During George Washington's second term in office, the Federalists and Democratic Republicans parties were formed. The stark diffrences between the two parties lead the the demise of the Federalist Parties and the rise of the Democratic Republicans.
As shown by Documents C and G, Jackson overstepped his Constitutional bounds in each of situation, that of the closure of the Second Bank of America, and that of the Indian Removal. If, as in Documents A and F, a particular section of society needs to fight against the majority, the Constitution, which is designed to provide for public happiness, is being somewhat ignored or misused. Another idea we’ll consider is that they were champions of political democracy. This is a two-sided issue. As compared to their predecessors and contemporaries, they were most certainly the more democratic party.
Hamilton and Jefferson’s plans differed opinionated, economically, and politically. Hamilton and his federalist standpoint were based on a strong central government, Strong national bank and an alliance with Britain. Jefferson however could be considered opposite. The anti-federalists opposed a strong central government and instead focused on a state government. They also opposed a national bank nervous it would give too much power to t he central government.
This is where the Constitution of the United States of America was born and with it came the opposing views of the Federalists and the anti-Federalists. The Federalists were strong believers in the Constitution, and believed that this was the only way to achieve a just society where people could have life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Federalists were generally wealthy citizens whose profession, in most cases, was law, such as Federalist leader Alexander Hamilton, who studied law before becoming a politician. The supporters of this faction followed suit being “[p]ropertied and educated people" (National Constitution Center: Home). According to the Federalists, if the Constitution had parts to it that didn't work, it could be amended.
Jefferson, however, argued that since the Constitution didn't state that it would allow a National Bank, it shouldn't be created. This is one example of how Hamilton and Jefferson felt that something should be changed, however, show differences in their opinions as to how to fix the problem. Another strong difference Hamilton and Jefferson have is their view on form of government. Alexander Hamilton is a strong Federalist, in which believed in strong government, similar to today's Democrats, while Thomas Jefferson was a strong Anti-Federalist, meaning he was against big government, which is like today's Republicans. This, again, indicates another example of how these two are so similar in views of things to change in government, however, have different visions on how to improve those things.
So a chosen few were helped make this conceivable, the Founding Fathers. The principal Founding Father and furthermore known as our first President would be George Washington. Other than him being most fit for the main leader of the United States, there are such a significant number of more explanations behind his commitment to the Constitution. He had understanding from the Revolutionary War, and from that it persuaded Washington that over the top worries for states' rights and states purview would be deadly to a successful national government. He was at that point understanding that states' rights were essential which winds up noticeably crucial when choosing our new government for the United States.
Essay Thomas Jefferson believed that the will of the majority is “the only legitimate foundation of any government”, and that the protection of the public’s right to free expression is of primary importance in a democracy. However, there are those who look back through the pages of history and note than when great changes have occurred in history-particularly when great principles are involved-as a rule, the majority is wrong. What is your view of the claim that the opinion of the majority is not always right? Living in a capitalist system, we are inclined to believe that democracy is the best solution for every problem, conflict or query that happens in the government, at the workplace, at the school and even in our families. While I agree that when making a decision that influences others’ lives one must be aware of the popular belief, people are not always informed on a certain topic of discussion.