Fast Times at Ridgemont High Analysis

2138 Words9 Pages
Billy Fleming Film Argument Paper WSC – F2 Professor Dresner 11/21/12 What the HECK Is She Saying?: Amy Heckerling’s Take on Early 80s Teenage Life as Depicted in Fast Times at Ridgemont High(1982) In the classic film, Fast Times at Ridgemont High, director Amy Heckerling ingrains several identifiable arguments in regards to social norms and structures of 1980s teenage and adolescent life. The film argues that teenagers are consumed by the confusing notion of sex, that typically teenagers support themselves financially and are consequently judged on the caliber of their jobs, the mall is the social utopia of the time, that high school is a wasted and dreaded environment, parents and adult figures are largely absent or oblivious to the affairs of high schoolers, and finally the lingering marijuana craze from the nineteen seventies remains pertinent to the time. Heckerling is able to assert such arguments through plot as well as a variety of filmic techniques including editing, mise en scene, and varying camera angles (Freitas, 2012.) You Haven’t Had Sex Yet?: How Heckerling Argues That Sex Is Essential to the Teenage Plight The most brazen argument Heckerling makes in Fast Times at Ridgemont High is that of the varying teenage takes on sex and just how vital it is to a high school student’s self and social images, however little they know about it. Heckerling depicts sex from a variety of characters’ standpoints. The easiest identifiable character in the film in which depicts this struggle with sex is Stacy Hamilton (Jennifer Jason Leigh) (IMDB). Even as a young freshman at fifteen years old, Stacy struggles with the fact that she remains a virgin. This is shown and understood through the early dialogue exchanged between her and Linda Barett (Phoebe Cates) in which they discuss Stacy’s unfortunate virginity and how she might go about losing it

More about Fast Times at Ridgemont High Analysis

Open Document