One of these policies is the divorce act 1969; which has made it easier for couples to get divorced. Due to this, marriage has become less sacred which has made the family unit weaker. Couples may get a divorce instead of trying hard in the relationship to make it better. Another law affecting the family is the new deal 1998; which makes it easier for lone mothers to get back into paid work. This was introduced by the Labour party, who Lewis argues have taken on the idea of ‘social investment in children’ seriously and have realised family forms are changing.
Assess the view that the nuclear family is no longer the norm. (24 marks) In this essay I will be assessing the view of different sociologists concerning the question ‘is the nuclear family no longer the norm?’, from this essay I should be able to conclude if it is in fact still the norm or not. First of all, in 1969 the Divorce Reform Act was put into place which enabled people to get a divorce easily compared to before. With this law people could simply say that the marriage wasn’t working out and straight away they could get a divorce, this had an impact on both family structure and society. After this law there was an increase in lone parent families, cohabiting and even same sex couples, this was because it started to be more socially acceptable and married couples didn’t have to be forced into a relationship if they weren’t happy.
Secondly they believe it is most important type of family as it stops deviance in children and also reduces crime caused by children. They also believe that there are some economic gains to being in a nuclear family which is that it reduces the dependency ratio of the country as both parents are capable of supporting their family, rather than depending on the government of financial support. And finally their view on divorce is that it creates an underclass of welfare- dependant female lone parent’s lone parent and leaves boys without the adult male role model they need However, postmodern sociologists support the view that family has become diverse in modern UK. They see that people have become fragmented and
Another main reason is the simple fact people are marrying later for many reasons, more because of the change in attitudes towards education and religion (seclurisation). It doesn’t help that the countrys ecnomy is in decline and the price of weddings not only was expensive enough but they are also getting dearer to match the current cost of living. From 1838 until. Nearly a quarter of children lived with only one parent (25%) last year and nine out of ten of these households were headed by
Children are now living with one parents (a lone parent family), with another family member or are being adopted. Divorce was extremely hard to come across in the past, it was very sociallly unacceptable, and took around three years before the divorce was filed. However in the more recent years there have been laws passing in order to allow divoce to be easier and cheaper for families. In 1969 there was the introcution of the 'Divorce Reform Act', making it easier for married couples to get a divorce. It is notivable that religioin is becoming a decline, so more people are accepting divorce as they believe religioin is less important, whereas in the past religioin was highly important and the church would not accept people to remarry.
One reason for changes in the divorce rate is the change in how divorce is perceived by society. For example, 50 years ago divorce was considered to be shameful and dishonourable. However, since then it’s no longer considered such a disgrace. The reason for the shift in social norms and values, particularly since the 1950’s is that it’s not as uncommon, due to new laws being introduced and changes being made to existing ones. The major change has been the introduction of the divorce reform act.
If the husband begins to stop doing some of his duties the wife will either need to pick up the load in order for the relationship to continue functioning or will begin to stop fulfilling some of her duties and the relationship will fall apart. “Functionalists say that we need to look at both structure (how the parts of society fit together to make the whole) and function (what each part does, how it contributes to society)” (Henslin, 2012). If we look at marriage in the respect of functional analysis each person has to fit together to make a whole and they have to work together to function. Functional analysis is a good way to look at marriage and divorce rates because when two people get married they fit together well and work together to function properly and when one fails to work the marriage ends in
Couples can share a life of dreams, excitement and happiness. Many believe that marriage put women in higher risk factors for abuse and violence. Marriage has become only a statement now because of the widespread social change. Many have stated that being marriage is not important any longer and choose to live together instead. But this is not the same as sharing an intimate and fulfilling life.
Marriages in India are more of a family affair, and as youngsters see the way their parent lives, they are more likely to understand that the output given is more stable and successful due to much lower divorce. Arranged marriages have been an integral part of the Indian society since ages past; around 75 percent of Indians, including 82 percent women and 68 percent, are conservative and prefer arranged marriages, according to The Taj Wedding Barometer, a survey conducted by the Taj Group of Hotels. In older times, the bride and the groom were neither asked for their consent, nor were they informed about the partner, as getting married in their religion and caste was more important. India is a home to many religions, and almost all of them preach arranged marriages. Hindus believe that a marriage is based on more than physical or emotional attraction, and at one stage Hindus were strict about arranged marriages where the parent’s decision was final.
There's a lot of people out there that probably do have a happy marriage and is trustful with their partner and has kids but once that happens it seems like everything goes down hill. It's fine if you share your money with your partner, and stuff because you should however when you and your partner have separate banking accounts or you either wash your laundry separate from each other's then there's a problem wrong with your marriage. Not everyone has a happy marriage there can be I mean there can be people that can get along good in a marriage but after so long in their marriage either there partner has cheated on them or they will and it's not right. I think to have a happy marriage both partners should at least come together and be financially set on money and they should keep there money together not separate because that can cause some problems. Now day's there's a little bit of people that have a happy marriage and then there's not.