Essay On Is It Fair To Describe Martin Luther

1255 Words6 Pages
In what way is it fair to describe that Martin Luther as a Revolutionary? ‘Radically new or different’ is the definition of ‘revolutionary’. It is has been an ongoing controversal debate whether to describe Martin Luther as revolutionary or not. Primary evidence Historians have, are of an ancient age of over 500 years which can make them unreliable, as they may have been lost in translation. Therefore, it is based on people’s opinions as to whether or not Martin Luther was revolutionary. Martin Luther began studying at the University of Erfurt in 1501 in which, to his fathers advise he was to study Law. Along with a main subject, students had to also study the 7 Liberal Arts. Luther was now not only gaining a knowledge of the Law and Human Rights he was also studying Grammar which built his knowledge of the proper manner of speaking and writing, along with Rhetoric which teaches on how to give good speeches.Luther also went on to study Theology. This was Luther gaining his base and confidence to go on through life. He may also of determined his wish of not wanting to go on to be a lawyer, but actually to become a Preist. Luther stated…show more content…
It can be argued that he was a clever man who planned everything to encourage his popularity. For example, the nailing of the ‘95 Theses’ was on October 31st which being All Hallows Eve the whole community would have been attending Church. It can be suggested that Martin Luther was not revolutionary but just the main influence to a reformation, he made a change for the better, to improve something that was already there. Luther wasn’t the first to try and it could be argued that if it wasn’t him, others would have also tried after him. Therefore, the change or the reform of the Church was going to happen anyway. Luther was just the right man at the right time, with a lot of help from the right
Open Document