Although murder is a horrific crime to commit, is death really the only just punishment? No, death is only the punishment the world has chosen for murderers. What is the difference between a murderer taking a life and a state taking a life? There is no difference because in a sense, they are both murderers. Capital punishment supports the death of one individual, the murderer, over the death of another, the victim.
Some crimes are so culpable that death is the only suitable penalty. I believe that the death penalty should be put into effect and if a human kills another human being, they should pay the crime. If someone has enough nerve to take the lives of others, then they too should have their life taken from them. Those are the people that simply do not deserve to live. Life is our most precious possession.
4. Knowing they could face capital punishment criminals may resort to a higher level of violence. 5. Wrongly convicted innocent people have received death penalty sentences and tragically were killed. | “Hard” sciences such as math are more difficult than “soft” sciences such as sociology.
Conrado Valido Frederick Knowles English Composition: Response Paper 11 February 2011 The Death Penalty According to David Bruck, “neither justice nor self-preservation demands that we kill men” and I beg to differ. Death penalty is considered as a controversial topic today. Death penalty is the best way to bring justice because it is cheap, it serves as justice for the victims, and it gives a higher regard to the victim’s suffering in the hands of the murderer. Although some people oppose death penalty saying it is immoral and a waste of life, it is still the best way to bring justice to the victims of heinous crimes. Death penalty is the best way to bring justice because it is cheap.
The death penalty is a big issue in today’s society. It has significant effects on the way in which our societies develop and how we view people. We might try to stay away from the people who support the dearth penalty and stick with the anti- death penalty people. I believe that the death penalty should be banned. The death penalty is killing innocent people, violating the constitution, and using a lot of money.
In the article “A Defense of the Death Penalty”, written by Ernest Van Den Haag, the author believes that it is immoral to allow murderers to live because they have the potential to kill more innocent people. He argues in favor of capital punishment by responding to six objections to the death penalty. With one of the objections, Van Den Haag responds by stating that the death penalty does deter crime and that it is actually beneficial to a society. He believes that people will refrain from committing crimes if they know that it will lead to their death. I reconstructed Van Den Haag’s argument below: 1.
Many different kinds of people shoplift. Shoplifting can affect a lot of different people and areas. These areas include the community, the merchant, and the shoplifter’s family. After I’ve been caught shoplifting, I realized how wrong it was and how it is a disadvantage to everyone involved. Since stealing has become a growing problem, stores try to crack down on shoplifters to make punishments as strict as possible so it doesn’t happen again.
Sometimes you just cant help it when a gun goes off. People kill people with guns on daily basics out of anger or revenge. I can say I had about two people in my family die because of a gun. It is one of the worst things knowing that someone had that much anger not to talk it out a problem they wanted them dead. It is really not something you want to play around with.
Execution is cruel, especially in situations where suspects are wrongly convicted. Killing a guilty man is horrible but killing an innocent one is much worse. "No matter how careful courts are, the possibility of perjured testimony, mistaken honest testimony and