Whether it is an influence on science or art, to anyone who has studied Greece in the days of its glory the influences be easily pinpointed. These influences continue into the art of war. As previously stated, war was a constant in Greece so much so that it became imbedded in its very culture. Consequently the way in which war was conducted in ancient Greece has become a portrait of the way in which it should be conducted, and set a standard around the Western world for years to come. Despite war being one of the most immoral, barbaric, and most appalling of all human creations, the Greeks did the impossible, by successfully portraying war as something of beauty, patriotism, freedom and self-sacrifice.
In fact, he conquered an area larger than any other single ruler before or since. He destroyed the harsh Persian rule, and united for the first time, and perhaps the last, all the nations from Egypt through Saudi Arabia to India. Alexander was a man of many legends, who was worshipped as a god and proclaimed as a pharaoh, who could not be stopped by any man, but who unfortunately died of a fever from a common mosquito bite. An archaeologist from Pakistan has described the importance of Alexander’s influence on India; his statements are also true of Alexander’s impact on the whole Middle East: Out of this great exchange between east and west, Greek knowledge, science, poetry, art and philosophy entered the ancient culture of the Indian subcontinent. There was destruction and loss of life, to be sure, but great things occurred which advanced the history of humanity.
Although he championed Greek civilization, he developed no appreciation for the achievements of the Persian Empire he opposed. He demolished one of the great powers of the ancient world without replacing it with a culture that demonstrably improved the livers of its people. In addition, his model of kingship, which exalted an aloof, militaristic, divinely inspired monarch, blended West with East but benefited neither. Finally, Alexander’s conquests, for all their brilliance, were personally motivated. Despite his love for Greek culture and his desire to fuse the Greek and Persian worlds, he never thought seriously about establishing political and economic institutions that could have helped unify a realm stretching from Macedonia to Egypt and from Greece to
During his youth, Alexander had tamed a wild horse named Bucephalus which he loved very dearly. Later when his horse died Alexander named a city in India after his name. His achievements in government and conquests transformed him into a legendary figure and worldwide influence in subsequent ages. He unified most of the ancient civilized world, creating a mighty empire. The vision and determination in making this possible was in him for most
Did Alexander the Great create history or was he just carried on by the tide of events, which were already occurring? I believe both helped Alexander attain his goals. He used the rising standard of the Greeks that was already in place, and continued its prosperity. Alexander had great leadership skills, which was able to help in continuation of the expanding Greek empire; the only thing in his way was death. Alexander assumed throne during the rising of Greece, and its expanding culture.
Alexander the Great Alexander III was considered a great because of his actions and many different accomplishments. As the King of Macedonia he did many great things. He attempted to conquer the entire world. He would have done it too but he had a quick unfortunate death. After his death the downfall of the empire he was building for 10 years fell.
It was Cesar who changed Roman Government drastically. Cesar also gained much of what is now the Roman Empire and proved himself as a great Warrior. Cesar learned to be a leader at the young age of 16 when his father died. “His father had reached the office of Praetor prior to his death, the office just below Consul, and at least helped set the stage for the Caesar line to return to the highest order”(Heaton). Then there is Alexander the Great.
to 330 B.C. Even though The Achaemenid Empire took place long ago, it is still known as one of the most culturally diverse and religiously open empires in history. The Kings of the empire decided to bring in new members with talent like Greek doctors, Lydian woodworkers and Ionian stonecutters, as well as foot soldiers from Ethiopia, Sogdiana and more places within the empire. This empire was the first hyperpower in history ruling about 42 million people. Chua concludes that a small number of Persians administer a very vase territory and population because of tolerance.
In the battle of Issus, about 30,000 of Alexander’s troops faced 100,000 Persian troops. After securing a victory Alexander was granted with most of Persia’s land. He then proceeded to take possession of Syria, and most of the coast of the Levant. Alexander’s empire was quickly growing in size and in numbers. 989.984.4502 Years were spent in conquest and battle.
Kayla Baker IIBWH p.7 Mr. Halleen December 12, 2012 Alexander the Great As most people would assume, Alexander the Great must have been pretty great at what he did to have this title put after his name. However, just because he has great in his historical name doesn’t mean that he is actually great. Alexander was a skilled warrior, yet he had some issues. Alexander the great doesn’t deserve the title ‘great’ due to his overwhelming need for power, war, and dominance. Alexander was born in 356 BC in Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia.