This will save time in the long run, which should encourage most employees despite their initial frustration with the management system change. A series of training and preparation with individualized tutorials might mitigate some anticipated resistance. Inadequate communication may also cause resistance. Management will make the major decisions with regard to the scheduled change; it is their obligation to clarify these decisions to subordinates within the company. Management is also expected to properly handle the inevitable questions and grievances; it is important to avoid misinterpretation regarding the procedural
team appraisals can sometimes be unjust, because one or two people could possibly slack when it comes to performing their job and make the team look bad. The organization wants all employee’s to benefit from the great effort that they put into performing their job; therefore they should be evaluated separately. A generic appraisal form for each employee seems to be fair it shows each employee his/her weakness and strengths allowing room for growth if needed(Fallon & McConnell 2007;
Supervisors should always be aware and encourage employees to discuss any issue with them. This will make sure that and problems the employees have, they can be dealt with early instead of turning them into grievances against the company and its workers. This would be the second best practice. When problems are dealt with when they first come up and employee feels like what concerns them is also what concerns the company and is therefore dealt with then and there or the supervisor can find out ways to deal with them. When problems are not dealt with they can become conflicts against the company that can take long times to settle since they employee most likely found someone who would listen to them.
They all also have their weaknesses. To form a good team, one must determine how to use their team’s weaknesses and strengths to the team’s advantage by first learning what those are. Relating to the company Nathan’s ability to lead can be a great help to the company go to new heights. His ability to be a steady worker that always shows up will ensure that the company is never lacking an employee when needed. His inability to show empathy could hurt the company when the person is a customer.
Active or Passive Diversity: I would say that Tanglewood should look into active diversity because it meets the diverse needs of the customers. Diversity is a huge part of the company’s hiring process and they don’t want to be labeled as hiring only one class of people. Especially since the need of each customer is different Tanglewood needs to make sure that they have the necessary qualified associates to take care of the
Decision making with your employees will let them gain respect for the leader and become more determined. This style will bring strength between you and your employees. Laissez-Faire-This style is used when the leader is lazy or distracted, it’s more of a you do what you want style. This style can be used when the team is highly capable and motivated, it’s when the team doesn’t need close monitoring or supervision. This style can cause failure when the leader expects the group to make the decision between themselves when they are un sure about what they need to achieve and how they need to accomplish the task.
It is important to be able to penetrate any barriers that the employee may have as a defense mechanism. A good manager of people realizes that once you have found an entry point into their employees heart; it is likely that the manager will be successful in motivating the employee. Because people have different personalities not all things goes as planned when you are attempting to motivate your employees. An excerpt from an article on bussinessball.com states: “Developing understanding of personality typology, personality traits, thinking styles and learning styles theories is also a very useful way to improve your knowledge
Reflection To realize their goals, organizations need to enlist the support of their employees. This assignment has provided me the insight to be able to identify some of the barriers that has complicated the communication process within my organization. Through my research I have gathered that communication cannot be easily defined but the conclusion has been the same among all researchers. They all agree that effective communication is a vital component in the achievement of high customer satisfaction. During my research I have concluded the foundation of a good organization is regular and complete communication.
MBA 540 Chapter 16 Case Study Why Teams Fail The common reason a team or corporate failures is because the leadership failed to convey its vision and purpose all the way down to the lowest level employees. It is crucial for the entire team to be in-tuned and understand why they are working for a common goal. As a result, the lowest level employees can see the big picture and be proud of each accomplishment. A positive working environment is when everyone understands and knows each other's responsibility. Another reason for team failure is free-riders.
Once someone is in the system for long enough, their attitude tends to change from merely wanting success, to actually hoping other people fail. The security of the individual depends solely on how successful they are in the climb. Essentially the ladder morphs into a pyramid where the lower groups ban together to protect themselves from the higher groups, think labor unions and the 99% rallies. The people on top know the power is theirs and don’t want to risk its loss, so they are constantly forced to remind everyone below them just how powerful and great they are. The end result of this system is fear, mistrust, and loneliness.