13th Amendment Changes

1494 Words6 Pages
Back in the 1800s, the government of the United States made some of the first changes to the Constitution. These changes included but weren’t limited to both the 11th Amendment and the 13th Amendment. The 11th amendment changed part of Article III, Section 2 of the constitution. The federal courts could no longer hear cases where a citizen of one state sued another state. The federal courts were also barred from hearing cases brought against a state by a foreign nation. A state must agree to a suit. That suit must be heard in the state's court system. The 13th amendment brought about the issue of slavery and abolished it in America. Even with these effects still in place, the Constitution is not the same as it was (Naegeli). With the increasing…show more content…
The mass media we have surrounding our lives today has a massive impact on our government. This is done by a number of different methods including framing, sensationalism, and priming. Framing is the way in which the media presents information in order to have people interpret things they way they want them too. For example, when the New York Times posts a count of the number of lives killed in the war everyday, it puts a negative spin on the war. During election years, especially presidential ones, it is common to see a candidate on talk shows, radio shows, and television commercials. Many of the candidates will go on these shows just before a speech or debate in order to use the priming method effectively. Priming occurs when media affects the way in which the public perceives a political figure. A perfect example of this took place following the September 11th terrorist attacks when there was nearly unanimous media praise for President Bush because his subsequent response was seen in a positive light. The last method used by the media is sensationalism. This occurs when the media covers stories that the public finds fascinating rather than the important issues. The JonBenet Ramsey case was exactly that. It has no important issues discussed about new laws, our economy, or what is happening in the world,…show more content…
Unfortunately, this hinders many people from running in office because they do not have a sufficient amount of money. The Constitution and its amendments were written to help give the power and rights to the people and this obviously does not allow certain people the right to run for office. In fact, the presidential campaigns cost so much money they begin two years before the presidential elections in order to have an adequate amount of time to raise money (Ginsberg, Lowi, and Weir 378). When looking at the 2004 elections, the national total expenditures were 403 million dollars. It is projected that this year’s elections total will be 453.9 million dollars and it is not even a presidential election year (University of Washington). With the costs being so high for campaigns, no matter how wealthy the candidate, they always raise campaign funds. The Federal Election Commission data suggest that funds are generally into fourths between being raised from small direct mail contributions, large individual gifts, Political Action Committee contributions, and political parties and personal funds (Ginsberg, Lowi, and Weir
Open Document