American army should be back from Iraq Presence of American army in Iraq is controversial since the beginning of Iraq American war from 2003. The main reason to call the war against Iraq was not more than developing of underground atomic power inside the Iraq which could be the threat against American and the rest of the world. America and its alliance entered into Iraq and searched for those atomic plants but were unable to found any of them, which mean Iraq war was totally failed at the beginning and there was no more reason to stay over there. Any independent nation has its full right to run its government under the way which its public wants. If the government is agonist the people's feelings, then the people have the moral authority to change the government system which is also under the definition of democracy; for the people, to the people and by the people.
Even until the September 11 arises, America is inclined to be nostalgic, and turn its cannon with fury to Third World, especially Islamic world, instead of sensitive introspection of its own deeds. A window of mutual communication is shut down. American flags “invaded New York after attacks”. In Changez’s eyes, a “cosmopolitan” state has turned to an arbitrary and narrow-minded foreign world. The flame of hatred is lit up, America has not only lost thousands of lives, but also the chance to talk and
Darwin Mushrush Am. st. 100 Prof. Smythe December 15th, 2011 The War in Iraq: What Did It Really Cost? The war on terror in Iraq was one of the most controversial periods of conflict in U.S. History, overshadowed only by Vietnam. The United States got involved in Iraq in March of 2003 because President Bush and Prime Minister Blair claimed that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and also had relations with Al- Queda, the terrorist group responsible for the September 11th attacks. The U.N. sent personel into Iraq to investigate for weapons, but came up empty.
However, it... Gangsterism to serve the interests of the Western powers. This is not a global conspiracy theory, it is a global conspiracy pact, with parts played - or not played - by various... Reagan Assassination Attempt brought up, Foster has been known to immediately end the interview. Several conspiracy theories have emerged pertaining to Hinckleys true motives. John Hinckley... Ted Art It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability... Comparison Of The Cole To The
Policeman of the World Policeman of the World Lucinda Richmond HIS105 12 years after 9/11, and amidst yet another debate on whether to bomb yet another Muslim country, America must stop asking the question, "Why do they hate us?" Forget the debate on Syria, we need a debate on why we're always debating whether to bomb someone. Because we're starting to look not so much like the world's policeman, but more like George Zimmerman: itching to use force and then pretending it's because we had no choice. Now, I'm against chemical weapons, and I don't care who knows it. And there's no doubt a guy like Bashar al-Assad deserves to get blown up: using toxic chemicals on unsuspecting civilians is purely and profoundly evil.
Sebastian Laszcz English III Pd.3 December 15, 2011 600 words Who is the government really looking out for? According to an article from pewresearch.org, the proportion of people that initially said that the decision to go to war was wrong has risen since 2007. Also, war can show how disconnected the government is with society because they never want to tell society what is really happening. All we know is that we have men and women risking there lives for God knows what reason, just because the government thinks that there is an actual issue to have a war over. This is just one reason why the government is disconnected from society today.
Why did America invade Iraq, and are still there? This is the million dollar question on everyone’s mind. America invaded Iraq on the bases that Saddam Hussein was in possession of weapons of mass destruction. That’s what the bush administration “believed”. Before they invaded Iraq they “asked” the U.N if they could look into the matter and search Iraq for WMD.
yasmin ALi Instructor: Croon English 101 10: am July, 30 2008 Invasion of Iraq The debate over the Iraq war is getting more complicated as some Americans’ believe invasion of Iraq was the righting to do money opponent believe that the us attack on Iraq was wrong from the beginning, because claims of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction and saddam- alqaeda link were all based on faulty. Even thou war is necessary sometimes to establish order and the cases of taken action has to be careful evaluated to avoid mistakes like the Iraqi war. For a centuries money westerns have cherished the tradition of victory. The blood shading, destruction of country, high cost of the war, the lost of innocent life’s and pollution of the environment are not worth especially when is based on false pretense.
He had blamed Iraq to be holding terrorists, he had made America believe that Iraq had been under Saddam Hussein’s clutches and that whatever he had to say was law. President Bush had stated in his speech that, “Saddam Hussein is harboring terrorists and the instruments of terror, the instruments of terror of mass death and destruction, and he cannot be trusted. The risk is simply too great that he will use them or provide them to a terror network”. He had made Americans believe that Hussein was creating weapons and developing a nuclear weapon so that he could “blackmail” the world. President Bush had not trusted Saddam Hussein and he didn’t want rest of America to either.
“At the moment, there is a myth in circulation, a fable that goes something like this: Radical terrorists will take advantage of our fussy legality, so we may have to suspend it to beat them. Radical terrorists mock our namby-pamby prisons, so we must make them tougher. Radical terrorists are nasty, so to defeat them we have to be nastier.” (Applebaum). This is the story being used for validating of torture. There is no proof that this story has any truth.