Was World War Ii Hitler's Master Plan?

653 Words3 Pages
Was World War II the result of Hitler’s master plan? Name: Institutional Affiliation Date: Discussion Was World War II the result of Hitler’s master plan? Yes – Andreas Hillbruger from Germany and the Two World Wars, trans. William Kirby No – Ian Kershaw, from The Nazi Dictatorship: problems and perspectives of Interpretation Yes: German history professor and scholar Andreas Hillgruber’s main argument is that Hitler thoroughly pursued his foreign policy ambitions once he came to office in Germany and that the Second World War was the unavoidable result (Mitchell & Mitchell, 2000). In 1919 to 1928, Hitler’s conception of his foreign policy developed in numerous stages before solidifying into a strong program. Hillbruger affirms that the full scope of Hitler’s foreign policy became evident shortly following World War II, particularly through his Second Book of 1928. This book made it clear how methodically Hitler pursued his goals without forfeiting any of his strategic flexibility. Hillgruber also states that Hitler’s responsibility for the war was revealed by exclusively focusing on his role in unleashing the European war in 1939. Hitler’s decision for a second war, which was very different in character started with the attack on Russia in 1941. And it is then that World War II truly started. No: On the other hand, Ian Kershaw’s main argument is that Hitler was accountable for the implementation of German foreign policy, which led to the Second World War, but was not free from forces inside and outside Germany, which influenced his resolutions. Kershaw states that Hitler only sporadically intervened in decision making in domestic matters and he did not show any reluctance to clarify new initiatives or to take important decisions in the foreign policy (Mitchell & Mitchell, 2000). Therefore, there is
Open Document