As he was the king, he had thought that he had the power to make the Scots use English prayer books. The scots were so furious that they decided to fight Charles I instead. This also made him unpopular to the scots as well as the people of England. When the scots had defeated him Charles had to pay lots of tax money which he couldn’t afford. So, Charles had to recall parliament, as only tax voted by parliament got rid of the scots.
Although Charles did many bad and dangerous acts, it wasn’t only Charles fault the civil war started. This essay will tell the reader who was to blame and why they were to blame. In my opinion I think that it was Charles fault because he made many greedy and stupid mistakes. Religious causes Long term causes Charles believed that when he became king he inherited from his father, the divine right of kings. This meant that he thought that God guided him in everything that he did or said.
Additionally, suspicions had risen of radical parliamentarians and the people were reliant on Charles’ return to stop this. These reasons are the main factors for Charles’ support in 1646. Charles’ return to the throne would have meant an end to Parliament’s County Committees, which many felt were worse than living under Charles’ rule. A large portion of the population had suffered the brutal dominion of the County Committees, which only worsened as the war progressed and Parliament became more desperate to finance the war. Primarily made up of fiercely loyal Puritans, the County Committees were efficient in reaching the monthly quotas set by Parliament.
Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence about many things that the king of England was doing to persecute the colonists. Here are some of the things he listed: “He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance unless suspend in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended he has utterly neglected to attend to them.” Which basically meant the King wouldn’t let them pass important laws they needed and the king wouldn't sign off on the laws, so when he wouldn't the colonists would suffer. Jefferson also wrote that, “For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us.” Which means that the government was making people house troops when they did not want to. Another one Jefferson wrote was, “For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by
In 1216 the Barons of England rebelled against King John, the Barons rebelled for a number of reasons, they include the trust between the King and the Barons, how John increased the taxes, the church and the rule breaking of the Magna Carta, some of the reasons were caused at the beginning of John’s reign, known as long term causes, and some of King John’s poor decisions triggered the rebellion, known as short term causes. One imperative reason that supports the fact why the Barons rebelled against King John was the fact that he did not ask their advice, a good King should always listen to the advice of the Barons. Instead he preferred to listen to the advice of foreign advisers such as Gerard d’ Athee. This annoyed the Barons and made them choose to not abide by the King. Consequently when he asked the Barons to provide an army to win back his land in France they refused.
Plus, one of his supporters called them ‘a council of drunkards’ which put him in jail. The political opposition that they faced was a more important reason for Calvin’s expulsion in 1538. As in 1538 four new syndics were elected. Though these men were in favour of reform, they didn’t necessarily want Calvin’s model. The new syndics were pro-Berne which meant that they wanted to practice the same religion as the one in Berne.
Congress men always think twice about the fact of losses of their States and their Civilians. Therefore the Congress now desired to build up upon nothing that would invent their opponent. The main concept behind all of these was nothing but to create a strong centralized government which is having more decentralized in authority and power. Congress felt establishing a weak national government will win the approval that time simply because it didn’t threaten or didn’t change the basic concepts of the exciting British laws among the States. Somehow they knew the limitation on the powers of Congress will be became more obvious once they change the method.
The King tried to force men to give up their rights to make laws. The King also called men together to make laws in the most inconvenient times and places, so they won't be able to go discuss the new laws. He made them pay all kinds of taxes without asking them about it. The declaration was the way colonist expressed that they wanted to be free from the King and of England. Some of the laws the king made were unfair and unconventional.
He is best known as “the man who lost Britain’s American colonies.” He enjoyed knowing that the real issue at stake in the colonies was not just taxation, but power. Lord North soon led Britain to war but the war turned out a disaster. He begged King George III to allow him to resign, but he was not allowed until the war was over. In 1782, Lord North resigned after a vote of no confidence. The Tea Act took place in May of 1773, in Boston Massachusetts.
This allowed Henry to eradicate any opposition that had potential to threaten Henry. The religious changes came to a halt in 1539, where Henry sends out a strong deterrent message by executing the architect of the religious changes, Cromwell. One of the groups who contributed disapproval was the clergy. This opposition had worrying potential to become serious because of the reputation of those who delivered it, for example More, who’s resistance was actually passive, did not actively deny the King’s title or offer any strong opposition to the regime, his trial was rigged and perjured evidence and the ruthlessness of his death meant that others refrained from open opposition to the King. In comparison, Fisher’s opposition was more vocal, he publicly condemned Henry getting an annulment from Catherine of Aragon, he was much more active in his opposition, delivering sermons and publishing books, an example of which being Sermon Against the Pernicious Doctrine of Martin Luther (1521).