'Utilitarianism Is the Best Approach to Environmental Ethics' Discuss

579 Words3 Pages
‘Utilitarianism is the best approach to environmental ethics’ Environmental issues are possibly the most controversial and most protested problems humanity faces. There’s an uncertainty and a sense of moral ambiguity when it comes to making ethical environmental decisions, often resulting in fierce campaigns. It’s safe to assume that because of this a clear, indisputable law would be useful in determining whether a particular action would be too destructive and permanent to continue, or would its benefits be so integral to the advancement or sustainment of the human race collectively that the collateral damage caused is ethically acceptable. The teleological view of utilitarianism means that the purpose or end goal is the most important aspect of the action. For example the deforestation of the rainforest to create farmland for major corporations, it creates jobs and allows the big companies to continue to produce a product to meet the demand of the population i.e. Mcdonalds. Through this ethical theory you would find the good in the result of the action in how much pleasure it provides to the customers. Bentham’s hedonic idea of quantitative pleasure coincides with this, the amount of people pleasurised/pleased, the duration of the pleasure and the intensity determines its value. The deforestation of the rainforest only directly affects a small margin of people whereas the production of 99p cheeseburgers across the world provides pleasure for inconceivably large amount of people. The burgers are delicious and Mcdonalds is doing well so they’ll be around for quite a while, this means that the pleasure caused by the deforestation of the rainforest to create farmland is ethically good. This is a particularly fool proof theory, if it’s good for a lot of people don’t worry about the consequences. However the process of achieving the telos for the people could result

More about 'Utilitarianism Is the Best Approach to Environmental Ethics' Discuss

Open Document