True Artistic Interpretations: a Literary Analysis of Genesis and Catastrophe

1386 Words6 Pages
Susan Sontag once said: “Interpretation is the revenge of the intellect upon art. Even more. It is the revenge of the intellect upon the world. To interpret is to impoverish, to deplete the world -- in order to set up a shadow world of “meanings.” Striking aspects are revealed when philosophical, archetypal and feminist approaches are employed in the short story “Genesis and Catastrophe” by Roald Dahl without which the aspects would not be apparent. Applying a philosophical approach, for instance, forces the reader to question the fate of an individual and whether their lives are a result of destiny. Also, an archetypal point of view of Dahl’s work helps the reader better recognize the use of archetypal characters and symbols common to timeless literature. Finally, a feminist study of “Genesis and Catastrophe” causes the reader to question existing gender roles and their impact on the family. Indeed, the author contends that individuals have different artistic interpretations of stories; therefore, the aim of some of these interpretations is that they may be said to be true or false depending on the point of view of individuals. Understanding the fate of an individual, archetypal symbols and gender roles of individuals are all considered aspects of artistic interpretations. One aspect the philosophical approach reveals when viewing the story, is a better understanding of how fate is involved in people’s lives. Indeed, the author suggests that individuals do not appreciate the small occurrences that are often unnoticed. Therefore, individuals must learn to comprehend and appreciate these chances in order to learn the difficulties of life. For instance, when Klara, the mother, reveals to the doctor in the beginning that all her three children died before Hitler was born, the doctor does his best to alleviate her. While the mother is still uncertain whether or not this
Open Document