| | |- be considered metaphors because the word or words used are not taken literally | Note: When the distinction is made, it is the following: when A is used to refer to B, it is a synecdoche if A is a component of B and a metonymy if A is commonly associated with B but not actually part of its whole. PART 3: SUMMARY 1. Which one is the most appropriate definition of metonymy a. Metonymy is the use of comparision of one thing with another. Metonymy is the use of word or phrase to indicate something different from the literal meaning. Metonymy is the use of the name of one thing to substitute for that of another to which it is related.
This is so, because verbless clauses are subject-initial. According to Cynthia Miller, “verbless clause express a predication whose central concern is to identify the subject, an interpretation that is theologically problematic within the context” (4). The problem with verbless clause in Biblical Hebrew has to do with the determination of which of the part to a verbless clause serves as the subject or the predicate. The simplest and the most insightful way to describe verbless clauses is to regard them as essentially identical with a subclass of the clauses in which the verb hyh can occur but has been ommited, thus creating the verbless or nominal clauses (Sinclair 52). The absence of an overt predicate - compliment appears to evoke some sense of the being or occurence of the subject in certain situations.
Labelling is “interpersonal” and defines what is not deviance or what deviant behaviour is. Applying the label creates the behaviour. Once you impose a label, that label is “stricken”. The process of labelling is not perfect and has certain consequences and does not only depend on the person labelling. Labelling theory suggests that “deviants are those people who have been successfully labelled as such by others” (Kendall, Murray, Linden, 2003:206).
The main representatives of rationalism were Descartes, Leibnitz, Spinoza, and Malebranche (Joachim, 2006). Hume distinguishes two types of perceptions: impressions and ideas. Impressions are the immediate data of sense experience, while ideas are weak copies left in our mind after a sensory experience. It also distinguishes between simple and complex perceptions. The simple are indivisible and complex are severable.
There are numerous definitions of cognitive style and what they generally share in common is an emphasis on a number of key characteristics as illustrated by the following quote:" Consistent individual differences in these ways of organizing and processing information and experience have come to be called cognitive styles ... they are conceptualized as stable attitudes, preferences, or habitual strategies determining a person's typical modes of perceiving, remembering, thinking, and problem- solving" (Messick, 1976: 5; 1984: 143). Key principles of cognitive style are also summarized by Kirton (1994) who sees style as: bipolar and non-pejorative; non-evaluative; not readily changed. In addition to stability and bipolarity, Sadler-Smith
This MUST be a sub-assertion. It MUST be COMPLETE, SINGULAR, DECLARATIVE, and SPECIFIC. Sub-Assertions are identified by Capital Letters. They are not pieces of support. The items identified with Lower Case letters (a, b,.
1. How do Eckert & McConnell-Ginet define the phonological level of language? What is an example of a phonological feature that we generally think of as (perhaps stereotypically) signifying a particular gendered way of speaking? (You can either use the example given by the authors or provide your own.) The phonological level of language in the reading is defined as a level of language that structures the units of sound (or of gesture in the case of signed language) that constitute linguistic form.
Uses of the Concept Studies and analyses about the term ’caring presence’ were eliminated, because the underlying idea of the term ’caring’ has not completely defined. (Smith2001,Brilowski&Wendler2005).The terms caring and presence can be misunderstood easily and the two terms need to be explained properly (Gilje 1993, Covington 2002,2003). It is necessary to define the word caring so that it can be properly distinguished from concepts such as caring, empathy,
|restricted vocabulary. | | |relationship between contexts and texts. |language features of mainly |Partial meaning that is conveyed and |Evidence of partial grammatical | | |Some recognition and awareness of the ways in|familiar texts. |exchanged in a narrow range of familiar |control and complexity.
20), all communications between individuals exist on a continuum that ranges from impersonal to interpersonal. Philosopher Martin Buber theorized that depth of any relationship between individuals is based on where the individuals communications’ fall within the communication continuum (Wood, 2007, pg. 21). At the most impersonal extreme is the continuum is the I-It relationship. In this type of relationship an individual is treated impersonally, almost as if the person is an instrument which is necessary to accomplish certain tasks.