They also that police inform suspects of their rights and their access to an immediate council. 2. Describe the criteria for admissibility of scientific evidence as laid out in Frye v. U.S. According to Frye, they would go by your blood pressure to tell if you were telling the truth or lying to a question you were asked. It must also be accepted by the scientific community.
3. CODIS is the COmbined DNA Index System. The current version of CODIS uses two indexes to generate investigative leads in crimes where biological evidence is recovered from the crime scene. 4. The primary ethical concern about DNA databanking is privacy.
I support John Locke because he expressed the radical view that government is morally obliged to serve people, namely by protecting life, liberty, and property. He explained the principle of checks and balances to limit government power. He favored representative government and a rule of law. He denounced tyranny. He insisted that when government violates individual rights, people may legitimately rebel.
Not to mention WIRETIME is unethical in their actions. Computer hacking is considered criminalizing under The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Under this, BUGusa would have the right to obtain compensatory damages and court ordered relief or other just relief. Steven and WIRETIME may be sued for the executed plot performed because it is unlawful to purposely access computer information without authority to do so, under section 1030 (a)(2) – Unlawful Access to Obtain Information. If he is caught in the act, he can be charged under Uniform Trade Secrets Act.
Drug addicts and alcoholics should not involuntarily be committed to a hospital for assessment and treatment. All individuals have the right to self-determination and their personal autonomy to live their life the way they choose should always be respected. Individuals of age should have the liberty to decide what is best for them without government paternalistic interference. If interference is required because an individual’s actions harm others, legal actions should be taken to punish them lawfully by still respecting their rights. The idea of legal paternalism in ethical reasoning is somewhat of a kind gesture from the Government to try to help individuals from themselves in the assumption that those individuals do not know what is best for them.
Police may seize property without a warrant if the evidence is in plain view (Justia.com, 2011). Police officers used to violate suspects’ constitutional rights by conducting illegal search and seizures that violates suspects’ rights. The exclusionary rule helps ensure law enforcement officers no longer violate suspects’ Fourth Amendment rights by obtaining evidence during illegal searches and seizures. The rule protects adults and juveniles. The exclusionary rule also deters unlawful police conduct because the evidence collected is inadmissible in a
Thomas Jefferson, The Declaration of Independence, and Revolutionary Ideology Bibliographic Essay Jeffrey L. Littlejohn Revolutionary America April 26, 1996 1 We hold these truths to be self evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness: that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as
A benefit for my position would be that you don't have to do something just because some deity or someone says its right. You do something because you know its right. Also, you are not restricted in what you do by something. You can live your life how you want to. But a drawback would be that you wouldn't be living for goodness or for a deity, you would be living for yourself and this could seem selfish to some.
The individual's feelings and preferences are not considered. Having people make informed choices and emphasising freedom of choice helps to reduce abuse. Having a choice over even a small part of your care and life means you have control and you’re more independent. People need to know the pros and cons of all the options to decide for themselves and which one suits them best. No individual will choose something which could harm them.
We as individual's should be trusted to make our own decisions for ourselves as long as those decisions do not interject on anyone else's rights. This entire philosophy of self ownership, is based on self responsibility and the idea that we as human beings have the capacity and ability to thrive and prosper without the guiding hand of “Big Brother”, and that we are adults, free adults. Society would become a freer place if this philosophy was