Use the fact that the brightness of a point source, such as a star, varies inversely as the square of its distance from an observer to show that the space telescope can see about seven times farther than a ground-based telescope. This situation "Makes sense". The reason that this makes sense would be simply explained by stating that the closer you are to something the easier it is to see. If a ground telescope has to first see through clouds and the atmosphere to see specific stars. That would mean that the Hubble Telescope being in space would not have to work as hard as the ground telescope and also give a better view because of the distance situation.
They would ascertain this information by the positions of the stars. Although, the study of astrology was banned over an academic disputation in Utopia in 1592. Progressively, astrology was challenged and debated if it should be banned from a well ordered community due to its uncertainty and lack of consistency in its
I feel that this argument fails to prove the existence of God. There is no real proof that God created the universe or people based on the teleological argument, although it is a valid argument, I just do not think that it is plausible that God created the earth. There are many other theories that give more evidence and better proof that counter the teleological argument. Works
Then Kaku states that force fields can do more than deflecting laser beams because it can levitate objects by the use of magnetic force fields. To support that, he explains that when we place two magnets opposite to each other, the two magnets will repel each other. However he wrote that making force fields and to levitate heavy objects is nearly impossible since we lack advanced technology. For my response, Kaku doesn’t completely explain everything. Suppose that you have a structure on a planet or a spaceship in the middle of nowhere, and suppose you don't want the force field on all the time either because there are times when protection isn't needed.
Basically their whole life depended on the stars. The Mayans used the stars to tell them when to go to war, harvest crops and other events of life. Astronomy is still in its use today especially because of the invention of the telescope by Galileo. Star spectrum is light coming from a star that is broken down into a rainbow. Spectra can tell us what makes up a star just by analyzing it.
A scientific control is the group not exposed to the conditions of the experiment, the control is designed to minimize the effects of variables other than the single independent variable. Site 2 does not have kudzu. BONUS QUESTION: (Worth 2 points) What is the difference between astronomy and astrology? Which of them is true science versus pseudoscience? 1.
· What are the benefits to using technology over a handheld compass and straightedge? To me there are no benefits to using technology over a handheld compass and straightedge. · What are the limitations to using technology over a handheld compass and straightedge? The limitations to using technology over a handheld compass and straightedge is that when using technology it is not as simple as using the handhelds and when using technology it is not the same or will not turn out the same as it would using a handheld compass and straightedge. · In various constructions, you need to use the longer of two segments to construct the radius of a circle.
Phenomena on the Sun’s surface | 1. Prominences, solar flares and sunspots are examples of phenomena that occur on the surface of the sun. 2. These phenomena are believed to occur because of the changes in the magnetic field of the sun. Prominences 1.
Newton also changed the way we, even today, look at physics. Because of Newton, we learned that the reason that the planets all stay in perfect rotation with one another and not just going around everywhere is because of gravity pulling on them (Kagan, Ozment, and Turner 272-351). What did both the Protestant Reformation and the Scientific Revolution have in common? They both went against the church. The Roman Catholic Church didn’t want people to use science to explain things in the universe because it went against what they believe God did.
The circumference came out to be 7.66 which was too extremely off of my previous findings. I feel that this moon has this ability for small amounts of change because of horizon landscapes and objects. Where you take these observations will add variety to numbers too if you aren’t located in the same location. This lead to my hypothesis having some basis behind it because the illusion has to do with the earth and its landscape providing the illusion. The illusion is based off of the moon’s size and the objects and landscapes connected with it.