Tanglewood Case 5

882 Words4 Pages
Tanglewood Case 5: Disparate Impact Anthony Web Abstract In this case I will be talking about if Tanglewoods staffing practices are leading to adverse impact, and if recruiting and organization can enact if Tanglewood would wish to improve the diversity of their applicants, and how they can design promotion activities to improve the diversity of employees found in their upper management. I will determine the 4/5 ratio with the average of whites as well for the African Americans. I will identify what is wrong with Tanglewoods recruiting process is and what they need to do to get more diversity into their recruiting interview process and what they can do to increase promotions of minorities, and females in career development, traning, etc. Title of Paper According to Tanglewood case there is an African American who feels as though he has been discriminated against, and so the lawyer wants him to file a law suit against Tanglewood, because the African American feels as though he was discriminated against for a promotion with in the company, and that he always had good reviews. It shows in the case that there are more white people that are in upper positions verses other minorities. 4/5 Ratio Data for Whites and Blacks, Minorities According to what I have went over there is a disparate impact, because there are more whites for the upper positions and more minorities for the lower positions. Here is what I seen according to the report for each job positions: * Shift leader-External-whites 21.00% , Non-white-22.00%, African American-23.00% which equals 1.05% and 1.01% African American * Department Manager-External whites-17.00%, non-white-9.72%, African American-12.00% and which equals 1.74% and 1.42% (black) Internal-whites-34.00%, non-white-26.00%, and African American-20.00% which equals 1.31% and 1.70% African American. * Assistant
Open Document